- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- >
- HPE EVA Storage
- >
- Re: continuous access logging to fata
HPE EVA Storage
1752600
Members
4044
Online
108788
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-25-2010 06:08 PM
тАО03-25-2010 06:08 PM
continuous access logging to fata
Hi I am about to start creating some DR groups EVA6100 to EVA4400, FC disk to FC disk. Is it ok to use FATA disk for the Log at both ends?
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-25-2010 09:45 PM
тАО03-25-2010 09:45 PM
Re: continuous access logging to fata
What type of logging do you intend to do?
For example in one of the planning quides it is written:
""IMPORTANT:
If you are using XCS 6.0 or later, create the DR group log using an online, fibre channel drive. Constant writes to the DR group log in enhanced asynchronous mode significantly shorten the expected lifetime of near on-line FATA drives.""
This year's EVA-4400 quickspecs have even started to disrecommend FATAl disk drives for CA replication targets when the source is on FC disks (when the FATAl disks were introduced this use was sold as a means to same great money):
""FATA drives are designed for lower duty cycle applications such as near on-line data replication for back-up. These drives should not be used as a replacement for EVA high performance, standard duty cycle, Fibre Channel drives. Doing so could shorten the life of the drive.
FATA drives are not recommended in Continuous Access applications as the remote storage location for local data residing on standard higher speed disk drives. Continuous Access tends to perform fairly high duty cycle random writes to the remote disk array. Matching remote FATA drives with local FC drives will impact the performance of your application, and will adversely impact the reliability of the FATA drives.""
For example in one of the planning quides it is written:
""IMPORTANT:
If you are using XCS 6.0 or later, create the DR group log using an online, fibre channel drive. Constant writes to the DR group log in enhanced asynchronous mode significantly shorten the expected lifetime of near on-line FATA drives.""
This year's EVA-4400 quickspecs have even started to disrecommend FATAl disk drives for CA replication targets when the source is on FC disks (when the FATAl disks were introduced this use was sold as a means to same great money):
""FATA drives are designed for lower duty cycle applications such as near on-line data replication for back-up. These drives should not be used as a replacement for EVA high performance, standard duty cycle, Fibre Channel drives. Doing so could shorten the life of the drive.
FATA drives are not recommended in Continuous Access applications as the remote storage location for local data residing on standard higher speed disk drives. Continuous Access tends to perform fairly high duty cycle random writes to the remote disk array. Matching remote FATA drives with local FC drives will impact the performance of your application, and will adversely impact the reliability of the FATA drives.""
.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-25-2010 11:19 PM
тАО03-25-2010 11:19 PM
Re: continuous access logging to fata
Hi thanks for your Response Uwe.
When i create the DR group it is my understanding that by default CV creates a 100GB log file, this is used when there is a loss of connectivity between SANs. I am doing synchronous replication so i do not believe this log will be used unless there is a disruption to Comms. If i have misunderstood this process please let me know as i am fairly new CA
When i create the DR group it is my understanding that by default CV creates a 100GB log file, this is used when there is a loss of connectivity between SANs. I am doing synchronous replication so i do not believe this log will be used unless there is a disruption to Comms. If i have misunderstood this process please let me know as i am fairly new CA
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-26-2010 08:27 AM
тАО03-26-2010 08:27 AM
Re: continuous access logging to fata
Lurkio, Uwe is right. HP no longer recommends the use of FATA drives for use with Continuous Access. It is best to only use FC drives. I know this, because I used to work for HP as the Storage Services Team lead for Canada. We had a lot of issues where customers used FATA drives for CA and ran into problems.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP