- Community Home
- >
- Software
- >
- HPE OneView
- >
- OneView 3.10 - 3.10.07-0310774 - Perfromance Data
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-18-2018 03:26 AM
тАО04-18-2018 03:26 AM
OneView 3.10 - 3.10.07-0310774 - Perfromance Data
Hello All,
We are getting requests everynoe and then from our customer for perfromance analysis and heathl indicators.
From the server side, application side, Network side, SAN side and storage side this is no issue, but as far as OneView is related we are always getting to our limits.
The analysis is quite limited, I can look at error counters and the dashboard but real time data and or bottlle necks and connections touching their limits are nearly impossible to identify in OneView.
Any idea on howe to get these information out of OneView.
Look forward to hearing from you.
Regards
Eugen
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-27-2018 06:06 AM
тАО04-27-2018 06:06 AM
Re: OneView 3.10 - 3.10.07-0310774 - Perfromance Data
I know how the mapping - server distribution is done on 4GB VC-FC module!
see attachment:
How is it done on a 8GB/20Port or 8GB/24Port module?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-02-2018 05:12 AM
тАО05-02-2018 05:12 AM
Re: OneView 3.10 - 3.10.07-0310774 - Perfromance Data
Sorry for the delay in coming back to you, but we have had a bank holiday here in Germany and I was out of office.
Thank you very much for your answer.
It is good to know that the FC-VC modules uses the originator тАЬFLOGIтАЭ for the the connection establishment.
However, my problem is that I need to verify which Blades is using which uplink port.
For our possible тАЬSlow Drain DeviceтАЭ issues it is not good enough that we know the the uplink ports are working properly and are not saturated.
I need to be able to proof that the blade in Bay one is using uplink port X!
As we are not in control of the SAN and Brocade SAN-Switches we have no other way to verify that we are clean.
I need an answer which I can use to inform the customer, even if it is not possible to verify that.
From my experience it should somehow be possible to get an view how thwe blade connects end to end to the SAN.
I can see which downlink port (Server to VC) is used!
I can see which uplink port is used (VC to Brocade SAN-Switch)!
I need now to know which connection is used (Server-Downlink Port to VC-Uplink Port!
Look forward to hearing from you.