- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Legacy
- >
- HPE ProLiant Storage Systems
- >
- Re: is "HPG6HPGC" reasonable for a physicaldrive f...
HPE ProLiant Storage Systems
1753837
Members
8892
Online
108806
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-23-2010 05:07 AM
10-23-2010 05:07 AM
is "HPG6HPGC" reasonable for a physicaldrive firmware revision, or has something gone wrong?
Hi, hpacucli is showing a weird revision number, it looks like 2 concated together like so;
Drive Model ATA GB1000EAFJL
Drive Firmware Revision HPG6HPGC
Is that reasonable, or has something gone wrong with the array and is returning bad values?
I was expecting "HPG6" or "HPGC" etc
Thanks,
Tom
# hpacucli ctrl slot=2 array B pd 4I:1:1 show
Smart Array P800 in Slot 2
array B
physicaldrive 4I:1:1
Port: 4I
Box: 1
Bay: 1
Status: OK
Drive Type: Data Drive
Interface Type: SATA
Size: 1 TB
Firmware Revision: HPG6HPGC
Serial Number: 9QJ2JXXX
Model: ATA GB1000EAFJL
SATA NCQ Capable: True
SATA NCQ Enabled: True
PHY Count: 1
PHY Transfer Rate: 1.5GBPS
Drive Model ATA GB1000EAFJL
Drive Firmware Revision HPG6HPGC
Is that reasonable, or has something gone wrong with the array and is returning bad values?
I was expecting "HPG6" or "HPGC" etc
Thanks,
Tom
# hpacucli ctrl slot=2 array B pd 4I:1:1 show
Smart Array P800 in Slot 2
array B
physicaldrive 4I:1:1
Port: 4I
Box: 1
Bay: 1
Status: OK
Drive Type: Data Drive
Interface Type: SATA
Size: 1 TB
Firmware Revision: HPG6HPGC
Serial Number: 9QJ2JXXX
Model: ATA GB1000EAFJL
SATA NCQ Capable: True
SATA NCQ Enabled: True
PHY Count: 1
PHY Transfer Rate: 1.5GBPS
1 REPLY 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-23-2010 10:39 PM
10-23-2010 10:39 PM
Re: is "HPG6HPGC" reasonable for a physicaldrive firmware revision, or has something gone wrong?
hello,
it looks just weird, maybe try diferent utility - acu, what show...
Latest firmware is HPGC...
Jan
it looks just weird, maybe try diferent utility - acu, what show...
Latest firmware is HPGC...
Jan
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP