- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- IMC
- >
- Current status alarms vs alarms that require manua...
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-05-2014 10:51 AM - edited 05-05-2014 10:52 AM
05-05-2014 10:51 AM - edited 05-05-2014 10:52 AM
Right now we have link up/down alarms that are logged and need manual recovery to clear the status. Is there a way for alarms to auto-recover depending on type?
Also, obviously if such an auto-recovered alarm appears above a certain threshold, example 3 connectivity losses in a day, then an alarm that needs to be manually recovered could be generated?
The objective is to show the current status of the network, but have an alarm stay "sticky" so that chronic problems may be addressed.
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-05-2014 03:38 PM
05-05-2014 03:38 PM
Re: Current status alarms vs alarms that require manual recovery
Link Up/Down alarms already do auto-recover automatically. If an interface goes down, it will raise an alarm. When it comes back up, it should raise another Info-level alarm, which recovers the original alarm.
This is standard behaviour, unless you've changed it. Both syslogs and traps can be configured with Recovery/Restore traps/logs.
There are some capabilities around alerting on frequent alarms, but I don't think you'll be able to get the granularity of control you might be after for traps. There are some more capabilities with syslogs around frequency/interval suppression settings.
You should also be checking your interface alarm filtering settings - you may need to tweak these to stop desktop ports from creating alarms.
There is also an option in qvdm.conf that delays forwarding of interface up/down events, which can help with suppressing short term flaps.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-06-2014 12:09 PM
05-06-2014 12:09 PM
Re: Current status alarms vs alarms that require manual recovery
Thank you, we will test this.
Where exactly is the "Recovery/Restore traps/logs" configuration located in IMC 7? I may be blind, I can't find it.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-06-2014 08:10 PM
05-06-2014 08:10 PM
Re: Current status alarms vs alarms that require manual recovery
Alaram details page has that feature.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-07-2014 12:25 AM
05-07-2014 12:25 AM
SolutionGo to Alarm -> Trap Management -> Trap Definition.
As an example, search for "Link Up"
Click the Modify link.
Look at the "Restore Trap" section.
You'll see something similar with Syslogs. When defining a Syslog to Alarm rule, you can set an "Alarm Recovery Rule"
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-07-2014 11:32 AM
05-07-2014 11:32 AM
Re: Current status alarms vs alarms that require manual recovery
Thank you, found it!