- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: Multiple recoveries on tape?
Operating System - HP-UX
1753482
Members
4311
Online
108794
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-13-2005 04:22 AM
тАО09-13-2005 04:22 AM
Re: Multiple recoveries on tape?
Patrick is correct, there is only one on the tape. He is also correct in that I do like the answers that make me think I have a solution much better than the others.
Thanks all for you responses.
Thanks all for you responses.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-13-2005 04:23 AM
тАО09-13-2005 04:23 AM
Re: Multiple recoveries on tape?
There are not multiple recoveries on a tape.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-13-2005 05:11 AM
тАО09-13-2005 05:11 AM
Re: Multiple recoveries on tape?
Ignite/UX is NOT a general purpose backup program. It is designed to restore (and optionally reconfigure) a system or with a Golden image, deploy new systems. I would never assume that the processor ROMs will not rewind the tape (and there are hundreds of HP 9000 models, each with their own boot ROM firmware).
I can't tell you how many times someone has called me begging me to fix a multi-backup tape, whether tar, cpio, or even Ignite where an admin forgot to properly position the tape before appending. This can be due to bad documentation ("this tape has 4 archives on it" but actually had 7) or more common, using the AT&T rewind device where the driver positions the tape in rather bizarre ways (see: man 7 mt). I've had reports of losing 3 months' worth of backup data due to a simple tar overwriting the beginning of a tape.
The new super-tapes now hold hundreds of Gb (and cost a lot per tape) and makes it very tempting to store multiple images. But without a tape content manager (which is what Data Protector or Legato, etc will do) you are risking losing everything on the tape. And with Ignite/UX, the first image is a bootable file which may be able to boot from the middle of the tape on one machine but perhaps not on another. And all it takes is a simple change in Ignite code to add a rewind in the recovery code and now your multi-backup tapes are no longer useable for more than the first backup. For insurance purposes, I would call multiple backups per tape a high-risk policy.
Bill Hassell, sysadmin
I can't tell you how many times someone has called me begging me to fix a multi-backup tape, whether tar, cpio, or even Ignite where an admin forgot to properly position the tape before appending. This can be due to bad documentation ("this tape has 4 archives on it" but actually had 7) or more common, using the AT&T rewind device where the driver positions the tape in rather bizarre ways (see: man 7 mt). I've had reports of losing 3 months' worth of backup data due to a simple tar overwriting the beginning of a tape.
The new super-tapes now hold hundreds of Gb (and cost a lot per tape) and makes it very tempting to store multiple images. But without a tape content manager (which is what Data Protector or Legato, etc will do) you are risking losing everything on the tape. And with Ignite/UX, the first image is a bootable file which may be able to boot from the middle of the tape on one machine but perhaps not on another. And all it takes is a simple change in Ignite code to add a rewind in the recovery code and now your multi-backup tapes are no longer useable for more than the first backup. For insurance purposes, I would call multiple backups per tape a high-risk policy.
Bill Hassell, sysadmin
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP