- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: what replaces the old check_recovery?
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-17-2002 10:22 AM
тАО06-17-2002 10:22 AM
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-17-2002 10:36 AM
тАО06-17-2002 10:36 AM
Re: what replaces the old check_recovery?
# man make_recovery
and it mentioned about "check_recovery" capability in the "-C" option.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-17-2002 10:36 AM
тАО06-17-2002 10:36 AM
SolutionThe check_recovery process slows the make_recovery process down considerably. HP removed the feature and would probably suggest that a regular schedule be maintained. We run it weekly.
Thom
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-17-2002 10:38 AM
тАО06-17-2002 10:38 AM
Re: what replaces the old check_recovery?
As you have found, 'check_recovery' is obsolete. There is no replacement. The philosophy behind having a 'check_recovery' utility has changed.
Simply, routinely execute (or schedule), 'make_tape_recovery' to cover changes in configuration. The old 'check_recovery' essentially made a snapshot of file timestamps and then compared that snapshot to a current configuration when run again. In practice, if you felt the need to run a 'check_recovery', you probably found out that you needed to recreate a recovery tape anyway.
Use the more robust 'make_tape_recovery' in lieu of 'make_recovery'.
Regards!
...JRf...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-17-2002 10:38 AM
тАО06-17-2002 10:38 AM
Re: what replaces the old check_recovery?
check_recovery for make_tape_recovery is planned for future.
http://support2.itrc.hp.com/service/cki/docDisplay.do?docLocale=en_US&docId=200000058668799
Hope this helps.
Regds