- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Switching and Routing
- >
- LAN Routing
- >
- Re: [HP 5900] does IRF create L2 loops ?
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-08-2016 01:03 AM
тАО11-08-2016 01:03 AM
Hi all,
I don't know very much IRF (I'm pretty new with HPE), in the first place I thought IRF was making a layer 2 loop inside IRF.
I mean, in the following senario for instance, I thought I should NOT configure my 2 5900 Switchs as IRF Cluster (see snapshot).:
Or do I have to use STP if I have a make a IRF Cluster, in such senario ?
In that case I need to make STP configure on WDM Switches as well, and I do not think it is possible (customer's Switches, I don't handle them).
Thanks for your help.
Fab
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-08-2016 03:05 AM
тАО11-08-2016 03:05 AM
SolutionSpeaking only about IRF (I ignore what is a WDM switch): I think the concept of IRF Stack that creates a Layer 2 loop inside itself is...somewhat...strange...why? because IRF technology is used to extend, through the usage of virtual switching, the switching capabilities through all of its IRF Members switches...so how a L2 loop between those members can be generated if the whole IRF Stack is properly formed and is acting as a logical virtual switch?
I'm not able to find the 4AA5-3379ENW (title: "HP Intelligent Resilient Fabric (IRF) Frequently Asked Questions" of April, 2015) document anymore ot the URL from which I downloaded it just few months ago (here). That FAQs was very helpful to familiarize with IRF (basically you can still see it here on a non HPE site).
Different is the case if we are questioning about an "external" loop that generates between non-IRF member switches and, as a side effect, involves the whole IRF Stack (let's say you have an IRF Stack - made of Switch A+B -, that IRF Stack is connected, respectively and separately, to both non IRF Member switches Switch C and Switch D, at this point you are OK...STP/MSTP a part...once you plain connect Switch C and D together you start having a loop but that loop originates externally to the IRF Stack if no STP/MSTP mechanism are involved to manage/prevent this looping).
I'm not an HPE Employee
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-09-2016 02:05 AM
тАО11-09-2016 02:05 AM
Re: [HP 5900] does IRF create L2 loops ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-09-2016 09:45 AM
тАО11-09-2016 09:45 AM
Re: [HP 5900] does IRF create L2 loops ?
@fab2 wrote:
Thanks Parnassus WDM switch is a (tranport network) layer 2 switch, so we are exactly in the senario A-B-C-D you described. IRF is clear to me at least. So in such case IRF without STP is definitively to be avoided. I'll go for vrrp I think.
Hello,
Please also keep in mind you need still STP/MSTP when decide to use VRRP for your switch cluster. This is because C+D switches are L2.
I would recommend keep VRRP + having LACP between switches A+B for redundancy. IRF is coming complicated when failover occurs and you have cluster split (fiber links between switches broken).
Michal