- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Switching and Routing
- >
- LAN Routing
- >
- VRRP: making two VR with four 5406zl, logging prob...
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-01-2011 09:48 AM
12-01-2011 09:48 AM
VRRP: making two VR with four 5406zl, logging problem.
Hello, I have the following problem:
I have 4 HP5406zl, two of these are running VRRP as vrid 1.
From some weeks, in order to setup another router, I configured the last pair of 5406zl to run VRRP as VRID 2.
The behavior of these switches looks "normal" i.e. both pairs properly manage their virtual ip addresses.
However, the first pair of switches are logging a message like this:
W 12/01/11 17:51:57 00776 vrrp: No VR with vrid 2 found on vid 11
and the second pair:
W 11/16/11 16:31:44 00776 vrrp: No VR with vrid 1 found on vid 11
I need the VLAN 11 be propagated between these two pairs.
I would like that each pair ignore the vrrp of the other pair. I believed that choosing a different vrid number was sufficient.
Any help?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-22-2013 02:41 AM
02-22-2013 02:41 AM
Re: VRRP: making two VR with four 5406zl, logging problem.
Hi,
Any answer to this question? I too am having a related issue.
Two 5406 switches using VRRP on vlan 2 (vrid 2)
Also have a load ballancer running on the same vlan using VRRP on vrid 5.
The 5406 switches have the logs filled with:
W 02/22/13 11:10:14 00776 vrrp: No VR with vrid 5 found on vid 2(944515)
How do I set the 5406 switches to ignore vrid 5?
Thanks,
Chris
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-13-2013 06:03 AM
05-13-2013 06:03 AM
Re: VRRP: making two VR with four 5406zl, logging problem.
Same problem here, but I am using 3500yl switches on one side and hav an ISP with juniper routers on the other side. I have vrid 2 on my side, they have vrid 1 on their side and I get :
vrrp: No VR with vrid 1 found on vid 4088
I would also like to know how to suppress these alarms in the log since they are irrelevant.
Best Regards Kristian Modess
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-24-2013 06:08 AM
07-24-2013 06:08 AM
Re: VRRP: making two VR with four 5406zl, logging problem.
After several tries, it seems that on the second vrrp pair I cannot get a shared virtual ip address on the Vlan 11.
The main pair has a virtual ip address on that shared vlan.
Some time ago, I tryed 2 configurations , one had the above logging problem, the other had a bad asymmetric routing problem.
So, the second vrrp pair could work, but without a virtual ip address on that vlan.
In order to reach the networks routed by the second vrrp pair, the first pair shoud know two routes for those networks.
So far, I used static routing only, but for a redundant setup, a dynamic routing protocol seems required.
I recently tested by using rip, but the route change takes about 80 seconds, that is unacceptably long.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-05-2014 07:43 AM
02-05-2014 07:43 AM
Re: VRRP: making two VR with four 5406zl, logging problem.
Run:
setmib 1.3.6.1.2.1.16.9.1.1.3.783 -i 1
And the alarms will be suppressed.
Best Regards //
Kristian Modess
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
09-27-2015 12:21 PM
09-27-2015 12:21 PM
Re: VRRP: making two VR with four 5406zl, logging problem.
Is this intended behavior or is this a bug ?
From my understanding of VRRP this should not happen !?