- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: Active-Active Arrays (aka XP/Hitachi) and VxVM...
Operating System - HP-UX
1753813
Members
7752
Online
108805
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-03-2006 06:57 AM
тАО11-03-2006 06:57 AM
I am now a bit confused which would be the most optimal configuration (performance and growth). Assuming my environment has 8 Fibre-Channel HBAs (i.e. XL2) and and say 256 LUNs, which would be better?
1) 64 LUNs in each pair of XL2s (dual path)
or
2) 8-Paths to each 256 LUNs and just have DMP do tis thing?
Let's also assume, the system is fully VxVM licensed (DMP enabled) and Array Support Library (ASL) for the specific model/brand is used/implemented...
1) 64 LUNs in each pair of XL2s (dual path)
or
2) 8-Paths to each 256 LUNs and just have DMP do tis thing?
Let's also assume, the system is fully VxVM licensed (DMP enabled) and Array Support Library (ASL) for the specific model/brand is used/implemented...
Hakuna Matata.
Solved! Go to Solution.
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-04-2006 01:17 AM
тАО11-04-2006 01:17 AM
Solution
Hi
We had a similar setup to yours and we chose option #2. It was a mistake. Throughput is much better after we switched to option #1.
We believe it is because if you chose option #2, the IO is broken up by DMP, and the XP spends too much time putting it all back together. If you do option #1, then the XP spends almost no time "putting the io back together"
Now IO times DO go up with option #1, but throughput is better. The numbers only give part of the story. This was a large Oracle database implementation
You might get a lot of theoretical responses, you can choose to listen to what you will, but this was pratical experience, which for me is always more valuable
We had a similar setup to yours and we chose option #2. It was a mistake. Throughput is much better after we switched to option #1.
We believe it is because if you chose option #2, the IO is broken up by DMP, and the XP spends too much time putting it all back together. If you do option #1, then the XP spends almost no time "putting the io back together"
Now IO times DO go up with option #1, but throughput is better. The numbers only give part of the story. This was a large Oracle database implementation
You might get a lot of theoretical responses, you can choose to listen to what you will, but this was pratical experience, which for me is always more valuable
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-06-2006 12:53 AM
тАО11-06-2006 12:53 AM
Re: Active-Active Arrays (aka XP/Hitachi) and VxVM DMP - dual paths or multipaths to every LUN?
Chris, thanks for sharing your experience.
I wonder if those runing AutoPath (aka SecurePath for Active/Active arrays) are facing the same dilemma.. i.e. for Autopath to just do the path decisions when dealing say with 8-paths to every XP or EVA4/6/8K LUN presented.
I wonder if those runing AutoPath (aka SecurePath for Active/Active arrays) are facing the same dilemma.. i.e. for Autopath to just do the path decisions when dealing say with 8-paths to every XP or EVA4/6/8K LUN presented.
Hakuna Matata.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-06-2006 11:49 AM
тАО11-06-2006 11:49 AM
Re: Active-Active Arrays (aka XP/Hitachi) and VxVM DMP - dual paths or multipaths to every LUN?
The issue is what DMP does. Any product will have the same issue if it performs truly distributed pathing, like DMP Does. DMP In VRTS 3.5 performs sequential path selection. First chunk down path 1, second down path 2, round robin like that.
With VRTS 4.0 and products like autopath/securepath, then you have preferred path, which will send more chunks down the path with the shortest queue lenght, etc etc, which might make things better or might not. Those I do not have pratical experience with.
With VRTS 4.0 and products like autopath/securepath, then you have preferred path, which will send more chunks down the path with the shortest queue lenght, etc etc, which might make things better or might not. Those I do not have pratical experience with.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP