- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: Max Physical Extents (again)
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-20-2003 09:58 AM
тАО11-20-2003 09:58 AM
I've searched and pe size comes up a lot but I haven't found anything much on Max physical extents. I'm just installing a new box, and want to avoid problems in future if I add new larger disks, The install is defaulting to max physical extents 4350 with pe size 8MB. (36GB root disk).
Even if I was to make the pe size 32 or 64MB I'm still going to be pretty limited as to how big a disk I can add later if I don't change max pysical extents.
Should I just make it 65535? I'm assuming once it's set its like pe size and not modifiable, Is there any downside to making it as big as it can be. say I decided the max disk I would want to add was 320 GB (hypothetically) should I just make it 32MB pe size and max phys extent 10,000?
Regards,
Tony.
PS. It's highly unlikely I will add any more disks to the root VG anyway but I will be setting up other VG's where it will be more relevant.
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-20-2003 10:11 AM
тАО11-20-2003 10:11 AM
Solution- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-20-2003 10:24 AM
тАО11-20-2003 10:24 AM
Re: Max Physical Extents (again)
Looks like I was on the right track. The biggest disks I currently have are 73GB, I may need to add some bigger disks in the life of the server, maybe not, so I think I'll opt for a middle of the road approach and maybe allow for a max disk size of 300GB,
On the root volume group I may just allow for up to 73GB disks, I can't see myself needing a 73GB root disk, but better to be safe than sorry :)
Regards,
Tony.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-20-2003 03:43 PM
тАО11-20-2003 03:43 PM
Re: Max Physical Extents (again)
u can define logical extend size while creating volume group use the -e option u can define maximum 32MB size
Thanx
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-20-2003 03:47 PM
тАО11-20-2003 03:47 PM
Re: Max Physical Extents (again)
The default size is 4 MB per extent. The extent size can be as big as 256 MB.
SEP
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-20-2003 04:18 PM
тАО11-20-2003 04:18 PM
Re: Max Physical Extents (again)
Regards,
Tony.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-08-2006 02:45 AM
тАО06-08-2006 02:45 AM
Re: Max Physical Extents (again)
I have a question on the same thread. Are the physical extend size propotional to that of size of logical volume. For example, if the volume is 75gb, should I just mention 8m and for 150gb, should i specify as 16m.
My largest volume group is of size 500GB.
Thanks,
Srikanth
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-08-2006 02:51 AM
тАО06-08-2006 02:51 AM
Re: Max Physical Extents (again)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-08-2006 02:57 AM
тАО06-08-2006 02:57 AM
Re: Max Physical Extents (again)
Yes accepted on the point. Are there any advantage of having lesser physical extend size, so that the extend size is efficiently utilized. If so, I will be happy to have 4m (minimum size) for all volumes.
On the other hand, if the maximum extends are quiet higher..does it takes longer time to scan and give the output and hence impact on I/O.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-08-2006 03:58 AM
тАО06-08-2006 03:58 AM
Re: Max Physical Extents (again)
The only downside to a larger PE is that you might lose a small amount of disk space because you are dividing a finite disk size into larger chunks so that the disk size might not be an exact multiple of some larger PE but would be an exact multiple of a smaller PE.