- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- SAN storage lun online status
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-03-2010 07:48 AM
тАО06-03-2010 07:48 AM
node is online but performance is degraded due to some links, paths, and connections being offline. I checked Links, paths, and connections, all of them seem normal. Wondering why it is in limited health. Any suggestions are appreciated.
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-03-2010 08:05 AM
тАО06-03-2010 08:05 AM
Solutioni think the clariion have active/standby configuration so this could be the reason why.
check this article :
http://konglingsong.itpub.net/post/41586/496801
clariion section : "Config for Clariion-side CX700"
mikap
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-11-2010 10:24 AM
тАО06-11-2010 10:24 AM
Re: SAN storage lun online status
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-11-2010 11:32 AM
тАО06-11-2010 11:32 AM
Re: SAN storage lun online status
Normally limited health is not "standard".
F.e.
On this 11.31 system connected to a eva5000, I have one of the eva luns in limited health.
ronin # ioscan -P health
Class I H/W Path health
======================================
[..]
disk 161 64000/0xfa00/0x41 online
disk 162 64000/0xfa00/0x42 online
disk 338 64000/0xfa00/0x88 limited
>> CONCLUSION -- disk338 is in limited health, while disk162 is in "online" health
ronin # ioscan -fnN
Class I H/W Path Driver S/W State H/W Type Description
===================================================================================
[..]
disk 162 64000/0xfa00/0x42 esdisk CLAIMED DEVICE COMPAQ HSV111 (C)COMPAQ
/dev/disk/disk162 /dev/rdisk/disk162
disk 338 64000/0xfa00/0x88 esdisk CLAIMED DEVICE COMPAQ HSV111 (C)COMPAQ
/dev/disk/disk338 /dev/rdisk/disk338
>> CONCLUSION -- both disk338 and disk162 are eva5000 luns.
ronin # ioscan -m lun
Class I Lun H/W Path Driver S/W State H/W Type Health Description
=======================================================================
[..]
disk 162 64000/0xfa00/0x42 esdisk CLAIMED DEVICE online COMPAQ HSV111 (C)COMPAQ
0/5/1/0/4/0.0x50001fe1500094fc.0x4002000000000000
0/5/1/0/4/0.0x50001fe1500094f8.0x4002000000000000
0/5/1/0/4/1.0x50001fe1500094fd.0x4002000000000000
0/5/1/0/4/1.0x50001fe1500094f9.0x4002000000000000
/dev/disk/disk162 /dev/rdisk/disk162
disk 338 64000/0xfa00/0x88 esdisk CLAIMED DEVICE limited COMPAQ HSV111 (C)COMPAQ
0/5/1/0/4/0.0x50001fe1500094fc.0x4004000000000000
0/5/1/0/4/1.0x50001fe1500094fd.0x4004000000000000
0/5/1/0/4/0.0x50001fe1500094f8.0x4004000000000000
0/5/1/0/4/1.0x50001fe1500094f9.0x4004000000000000
0/5/1/0/4/0.0x50001fe1500094fc.0x4003000000000000
0/5/1/0/4/0.0x50001fe1500094f8.0x4003000000000000
0/5/1/0/4/1.0x50001fe1500094fd.0x4003000000000000
0/5/1/0/4/1.0x50001fe1500094f9.0x4003000000000000
/dev/disk/disk338 /dev/rdisk/disk338
>> CONCLUSION -- but disk162 has 4 paths, while disk338 has 8 paths
which can also be seen from
ronin # ioscan -m dsf
Persistent DSF Legacy DSF(s)
========================================
[..]
/dev/rdisk/disk338 /dev/rdsk/c50t0d4
/dev/rdsk/c54t0d4
/dev/rdsk/c52t0d4
/dev/rdsk/c56t0d4
/dev/rdsk/c50t0d3
/dev/rdsk/c52t0d3
/dev/rdsk/c54t0d3
/dev/rdsk/c56t0d3
[..]
/dev/rdisk/disk162 /dev/rdsk/c50t0d2
/dev/rdsk/c52t0d2
/dev/rdsk/c54t0d2
/dev/rdsk/c56t0d2
And offcourse the eva5000 has only 4 paths, disk162 is clearly "binded" to eva5000 lun "2", while disk338 seems to have been "binded" with both lun "3" and lun "4", what offcourse is impossible .. so which lun is disk338 really "binded" to..
ronin # ioscan -fn
Class I H/W Path Driver S/W State H/W Type Description
=====================================================================================
[..]
disk 339 0/5/1/0/4/0.1.20.0.0.0.3 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE COMPAQ HSV111 (C)COMPAQ
/dev/dsk/c52t0d3 /dev/rdsk/c52t0d3
disk 345 0/5/1/0/4/0.1.20.0.0.0.4 sdisk NO_HW DEVICE COMPAQ HSV111 (C)COMPAQ
/dev/dsk/c52t0d4 /dev/rdsk/c52t0d4
[..]
disk 337 0/5/1/0/4/0.74.46.0.0.0.3 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE COMPAQ HSV111 (C)COMPAQ
/dev/dsk/c50t0d3 /dev/rdsk/c50t0d3
disk 342 0/5/1/0/4/0.74.46.0.0.0.4 sdisk NO_HW DEVICE COMPAQ HSV111 (C)COMPAQ
/dev/dsk/c50t0d4 /dev/rdsk/c50t0d4
[..]
disk 341 0/5/1/0/4/1.34.19.0.0.0.3 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE COMPAQ HSV111 (C)COMPAQ
/dev/dsk/c56t0d3 /dev/rdsk/c56t0d3
disk 346 0/5/1/0/4/1.34.19.0.0.0.4 sdisk NO_HW DEVICE COMPAQ HSV111 (C)COMPAQ
/dev/dsk/c56t0d4 /dev/rdsk/c56t0d4
[..]
disk 340 0/5/1/0/4/1.42.46.0.0.0.3 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE COMPAQ HSV111 (C)COMPAQ
/dev/dsk/c54t0d3 /dev/rdsk/c54t0d3
disk 343 0/5/1/0/4/1.42.46.0.0.0.4 sdisk NO_HW DEVICE COMPAQ HSV111 (C)COMPAQ
/dev/dsk/c54t0d4 /dev/rdsk/c54t0d4
>> CONCLUSION -- disk338 is binded to "lun 3" , as all "lun 4" device files, give a NO_HW ioscan state
NOTE: Story behind this limited health, was that I was doing testing a eva snapshot procedure, which required using replace_wwid which made the above possible..
Probably if I would reboot now my system, the NO_HW paths would get removed, which means that disk338 would only keep 4 paths, and the health of disk338, would return to online..
Greetz,
Chris
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-15-2010 11:17 AM
тАО11-15-2010 11:17 AM