- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- migration VG PACKAGE to 2.1 or 2.1
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-11-2011 11:19 AM
тАО01-11-2011 11:19 AM
Now some of my packages has failover to adoptive node which also has same VG as primary node in cluster. When i run vgversion to migrate my VG on primary to 2.1 or 2.2, it works successfully.
i would like to know how to migrate the VG on adoptive to same version as primary, is it the same step that i did with primary. Do i have to move my package to adoptive, then run vgversion from their.
now if i keep the old VG version on adoptive and later i decide to failover, is this going to crash?
thanks
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-11-2011 06:29 PM
тАО01-11-2011 06:29 PM
SolutionPlease find the answers to your question.
Q. i would like to know how to migrate the VG on adoptive to same version as primary, is it the same step that i did with primary. Do i have to move my package to adoptive, then run vgversion from their.
Ans: No you dont have to do that.To confirm weather the changes in the VG version has reflected on both the systems by running the command below.
unix:/root# lvmadm -l
--- Version 1.0 volume groups ---
VG Name /dev/vg00
PV Name /dev/disk/disk9_p2
VG Name /dev/vgasm
PV Name /dev/dsk/c4t0d0
/dev/dsk/c6t0d0
/dev/disk/disk7
VG Name /dev/vgapli
PV Name /dev/disk/disk8
--- Version 2.1 volume groups ---
VG Name /dev/vgdocumentum
PV Name /dev/disk/disk10
Run this command on both the nodes and then send us the output.
But the vgversion changes gets reflected to both the nodes.
Q. now if i keep the old VG version on adoptive and later i decide to failover, is this going to crash?
Nothing is going to crash as the changes gets refleted to both the nodes.
Thanks
Vivek Bhatia
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-12-2011 04:21 AM
тАО01-12-2011 04:21 AM
Re: migration VG PACKAGE to 2.1 or 2.1
Thanks
Manix
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-12-2011 07:10 AM
тАО01-12-2011 07:10 AM
Re: migration VG PACKAGE to 2.1 or 2.1
NO didn't updated the vg on adoptive node.
Below is the list of lvmadm -l on each node.
the VG version remains the same on adoptive node after the migration.
Primary NOde:
root@server014:/etc/cmcluster/CDX$ lvmadm -l
--- Version 2.2 volume groups ---
VG Name /dev/vgtr1
PV Name /dev/disk/disk1161
/dev/disk/disk1166
Adoptive Node:
root@server015:/home/root$ lvmadm -l
--- Version 1.0 volume groups ---
VG Name /dev/vgtr1
PV Name /dev/disk/disk723
/dev/disk/disk727
conf file in /etc/cmcluster/tr1.conf
# Legal values for node_name:
node_name server014
node_name server015
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-12-2011 07:26 AM
тАО01-12-2011 07:26 AM
Re: migration VG PACKAGE to 2.1 or 2.1
Hope this helps!
Regards
Torsten.
__________________________________________________
There are only 10 types of people in the world -
those who understand binary, and those who don't.
__________________________________________________
No support by private messages. Please ask the forum!
If you feel this was helpful please click the KUDOS! thumb below!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-12-2011 07:31 AM
тАО01-12-2011 07:31 AM
Re: migration VG PACKAGE to 2.1 or 2.1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-12-2011 09:53 AM
тАО01-12-2011 09:53 AM
Re: migration VG PACKAGE to 2.1 or 2.1
Q. which mean that i have to delete the old VG on adoptive node then re-create VG with mknod c 128 because the major number and the minor number are not the same before doing vgimport?
Ans. If the operating system version you are using is after a 2008 release then you dont have to do a mknod as it will get automatically created when you run vgimport.
Otherwise you have to create group file using mknod.
major is the major number for the group device file. For a Version 1.0 volume group, it is 64. For a Version 2.x volume group, it is 128.
For a Version 2.x volume group, minor has the form 0xnnn000, where nnn is a unique number across all Version 2.x volume groups.
BTW you forgot to assign points to the people who have replied.
Thanks
Vivek Bhatia
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-12-2011 09:57 AM
тАО01-12-2011 09:57 AM
Re: migration VG PACKAGE to 2.1 or 2.1
Thanks again.