- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Legacy
- >
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- >
- Does Java on Alpha Tru64 consume much more runtime...
Operating System - Tru64 Unix
1752800
Members
5680
Online
108789
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-09-2007 08:51 AM
03-09-2007 08:51 AM
Does Java on Alpha Tru64 consume much more runtime memory than on Intel Windows?
I have an identical Java jar file running on both Alpha Tru64 and Windows Intel.
ps aux |head
USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY S STARTED TIME COMMAND
apache 42048 0.0 14.8 161M 151M ?? S Mar 02 0:14.79 java -jar
We compare this to Windows 2003 Server running the same program
C:\> tasklist /fi "imagename eq java.exe"
Image Name PID Session Name Session# Mem Usage
java.exe 1672 Console 0 17.432 K
On Tru64 the program uses 150 MB virtual memory while on Windows it would only show 17 MB.
Would this indicate that Alpha Tru64 Java is using 9 x more memory than Windows??
The Windows machine is 32 bit, while the Alpha is 64 bit, so some data structures would consume more memory? Where is the difference? Or could it be an effect of the garbarge collector having a different behaviour?
Or did I understood that on Tru64 the Java opcode is compiled to native machine code? This could help to speed up the execution of the program at the expense of using more memory?
ps aux |head
USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY S STARTED TIME COMMAND
apache 42048 0.0 14.8 161M 151M ?? S Mar 02 0:14.79 java -jar
We compare this to Windows 2003 Server running the same program
C:\> tasklist /fi "imagename eq java.exe"
Image Name PID Session Name Session# Mem Usage
java.exe 1672 Console 0 17.432 K
On Tru64 the program uses 150 MB virtual memory while on Windows it would only show 17 MB.
Would this indicate that Alpha Tru64 Java is using 9 x more memory than Windows??
The Windows machine is 32 bit, while the Alpha is 64 bit, so some data structures would consume more memory? Where is the difference? Or could it be an effect of the garbarge collector having a different behaviour?
Or did I understood that on Tru64 the Java opcode is compiled to native machine code? This could help to speed up the execution of the program at the expense of using more memory?
- Tags:
- Java
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP