error #2247: member has already been defined

[Anwarul Kabir]

Trying to compile a 32 bit running application in 64 bit and getting this error:

aCC +DD64 -AA -z -g -mt -DSTD_AA +Z -I. -I../inc -I../../../lib/db_ob/inc -I../../../lib/utility/inc -I../../../lib/xml/inc -c xlator_11.cpp
"xlator_11.cpp", line 30: error #2247: member "xlator_11::factory9_" has
already been defined
xlator_11::factory9_("MIS_IND_ALIAS_ADD", new(nothrow) xlator_11("1", false, true));
^

"xlator_11.cpp", line 30: error #2018: expected a ")"
xlator_11::factory9_("MIS_IND_ALIAS_ADD", new(nothrow) xlator_11("1", false, true));
^

Code in the xlator.cpp in line 30(here I am copying from line 25+-) are:

aggregate_factory
xlator_11::factory8_("MIS_IND_ADMIN_ADD", new(nothrow) xlator_11("8", false));
aggregate_factory
xlator_11::factory9_("PDB_IND_ALIAS_ADD", new(nothrow) xlator_11("1", false, true));
aggregate_factory
xlator_11::factory9_("MIS_IND_ALIAS_ADD", new(nothrow) xlator_11("1", false, true));
aggregate_factory
xlator_11::factory10_("PDB_IND_UPD", new(nothrow) xlator_11("3", false, true));
aggregate_factory
xlator_11::factory11_("MIS_IND_UPD", new(nothrow) xlator_11("3", false, true));

Now I can see its call factory9 twice but my guess since its working in 32 why its giving me an error in 64? is there a syntax change that i need to do for the 64 compiler to understand this code?

[Anwarul Kabir]

aggregate_factory
xlator_11::factory9_("PDB_IND_ALIAS_ADD", new(nothrow) xlator_11("1", false, true));
aggregate_factory
xlator_11::factory9_("MIS_IND_ALIAS_ADD", new(nothrow) xlator_11("1", false, true));

[Dennis Handly]

It looks illegal to me. Why are you trying to define the same variable factory9_ twice?

Have you compiled your application in 32 bit mode?

[Anwarul Kabir]

I didn't compile it my self but the application is running as we speak and in production. its an old application which had been working for at leat 5/10 years i believe...

[Dennis Handly]

>Its an old application which had been working for at least 5/10 years I believe.

The aCC6 compiler is better at catching errors, aCC5 ignored the duplicate.

Before you ported to 64 bit, have you compiled with aCC6 just to see what messages you got?

[Anwarul Kabir]

no. They just gave me the code and told me to compile it in new system...
I am not sure what version of acc they have used for the old system.
one thing is if i commented out the 2nd line it compiles but i am afraid that the application will not do what it suppose to do if i comment out lines like these, as they have used same kind of duplicate declration in many places....

[Dennis Handly]

>I am not sure what version of aCC they have used for the old system.

It is obsolete aCC5.

>but I am afraid that the application will not do what it suppose to do if I comment out lines like these

aCC5 seems to ignore the second one.

[Anwarul Kabir]

I was able to do a aCC - V in the old system and in the new too

OLD:
aCC: HP ANSI C++ B3910B A.03.63

New:
aCC: HP C/aC++ B3910B A.06.15 [May 16 2007]

[Dennis Handly]

>A.03.63

This is aCC3, it has the similar problems as aCC5.

[Anwarul Kabir]

I guess its then the compiler. I have actually created a second line like the error in the header so that it was defined twice in header and that has stopped the error in the cpp.

Hopefully this will work.