- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Entry Storage Systems
- >
- MSA Storage
- >
- EVA
MSA Storage
1748136
Members
3808
Online
108758
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-13-2007 06:19 AM
08-13-2007 06:19 AM
EVA
I was wondering if someone could clarify a best practice solution that we are having?
Hp has given me conflicting opinions on how many disk groups we should have. I was taught at HP school to have one, but recently an HP engineer said we should have two especially if we are running a database incase the meta data get corrupted.
Currently we have one disk group and have two vdisk per sql server (1 for logs 1 for database)
Hp has given me conflicting opinions on how many disk groups we should have. I was taught at HP school to have one, but recently an HP engineer said we should have two especially if we are running a database incase the meta data get corrupted.
Currently we have one disk group and have two vdisk per sql server (1 for logs 1 for database)
1 REPLY 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-13-2007 07:01 AM
08-13-2007 07:01 AM
Re: EVA
Well, as always, it depends!!
Performance wise one disk group is best
Availability wise more than one disk group can be beneficial
You find the official HP best practice configuration guidelines in the following two whitepapers:
http://h71028.www7.hp.com/ERC/downloads/4AA0-2787ENW.pdf
http://h71028.www7.hp.com/ERC/downloads/4AA1-4202ENW.pdf
Cheers
Peter
Performance wise one disk group is best
Availability wise more than one disk group can be beneficial
You find the official HP best practice configuration guidelines in the following two whitepapers:
http://h71028.www7.hp.com/ERC/downloads/4AA0-2787ENW.pdf
http://h71028.www7.hp.com/ERC/downloads/4AA1-4202ENW.pdf
Cheers
Peter
I love storage
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP