- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Entry Storage Systems
- >
- MSA Storage
- >
- Re: FC2243 + MSA 1500 cs poor perfomance
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-30-2011 03:42 AM
01-30-2011 03:42 AM
FC2243 + MSA 1500 cs poor perfomance
Hi all.
here's my scenery:
A MSA1500 cs with 4 MSA20 SATA boxes connected. Volumes RAID 6 ADG on those disk.
2 servers can access that box:
DL385 G2 with A8003A FC Card, PCI-E-> GOOD PERFORMANCE
DL360 G4 with FC2243 FC Card PCI-X -> TERRIBLE PERFORMANCE
I used sqlbcksim tool to simulate sequential write con the box (I use the msa for disk backups)
Here are the details of the test. (200 GB but with 6 GB file even better results, I used 200 GB file just to be sure to avoid to use the controller or server cache)
T:\>sqlbcksim.exe t:\test 2 200000 1
File name = t:\test
Version = 2 , Backup Size (MB) = 200000
Write Back mode
Allocating 1MB
Memsetting 1MB
Opening file at 13:16:14
Writing headers
Writing data
Closing file at 13:22:04
Time elapsed (minutes): 5:50
Average throughput: 571.43 Mb/s
----
write just 6 GB file:
DL360 G4 PCI X 4 Gb emulex FC2243
K:\SQLBCKSIM>sqlbcksim r:\test 2 6100 1
File name = r:\test
Version = 2 , Backup Size (MB) = 6100
Write Back mode
Allocating 1MB
Memsetting 1MB
Opening file at 17:58:03
Writing headers
Writing data
Closing file at 18:00:57
Time elapsed (minutes): 2:54
Average throughput: 35.06 Mb/s
Sim Complete
----
The fact is on DL360 server, after 2 GB written (as fast as the DL385 server) , the write drops to about 20 MB/s, then stops, then write 20 MB,... and so on.
On MSA i use fw 7.20 A/A. I also updated the firmware and drivers on the fc2243 emulex card with no effect. I can't find crc errors on onecommand console, I also tried to change the fiber that connects the hba to the switch with no effect...
I also did some tests using sqlio benchmark with similar results.
Where's the problem? Why this huge difference?
Thank you all in advance for your help.
Alessandro
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-31-2011 07:27 AM
01-31-2011 07:27 AM
Re: FC2243 + MSA 1500 cs poor perfomance
Another "confusing" info:
Another test: I connected another server, DL360 G5 server, with A8003A PCI-E hba.
With my surprise, the write performance is as slow as with DL360 G4 with FC 2243. :mansurprised:
In all the cases the Operationg System is Win2008 R2. All the tests have been made with latest drivers and firmwares.
The problem is not the LUN because I tried to move the same lun among the 3 servers: Slow with DL360 G4 and G5, fast with DL385 G2. The big difference is the Memory available, the DL385 has 16 Gb, while DL360s have only 4 GB. But I really believe the RAM is not the matter, because i tried to write a 200 GB file...
I am really confused...
Any ideas?