- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- BL870 networking - APA
Operating System - HP-UX
1753797
Members
7961
Online
108799
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-28-2010 05:51 AM
05-28-2010 05:51 AM
BL870 networking - APA
Hello,
I am new to blades.
Does this lan config look ok?
lan900 contains lan1 and lan2 for failover purposes.
It looks to me like lan0&1 are the same physical lan card and lan2&3 are the same physical card.
Therefore, lan900 should contain a port from each card for redundancy.
The reason I ask is our Windows team seems to use 2 ports from the same card for a failover setup. Being new to blades I am not 100% clear at what I am seeing.
Innterconnect Bay1 on the enclosure contains lan0&2. Innterconnect Bay2 on the enclosure contains lan1&3.
So does it makes since to use lan1&2 to create lan900? (versus lan0&1) Or does it matter?
nwmgr -S apa
Class Mode Load Speed- Membership
Instance Balancing Duplex
======== =========== ========= ==================== ===========================
lan900 LAN_MONITOR LB_HS 1 Gbps Full Duplex 1,2
ioscan -funC lan
Class I H/W Path Driver S/W State H/W Type Description
===================================================================
lan 0 0/1/1/0 igelan CLAIMED INTERFACE HP PCI-X 1000Mbps Dual-port Built-in
lan 1 0/1/1/1 igelan CLAIMED INTERFACE HP PCI-X 1000Mbps Dual-port Built-in
lan 2 0/2/2/0 igelan CLAIMED INTERFACE HP PCI-X 1000Mbps Dual-port Built-in
lan 3 0/2/2/1 igelan CLAIMED INTERFACE HP PCI-X 1000Mbps Dual-port Built-in
from Onboard Administrator:
Mezzanine Slot Mezzanine Device Mezzanine Device Port Port Status Interconnect Bay Interconnect Bay Port Device ID
Embedded Embedded Ethernet
Port 1 OK Bay 1 Port 14 00:22:64:35:CE:F0
Port 2 OK Bay 2 Port 14 00:22:64:35:CE:F1
Port 3 OK Bay 1 Port 6 00:22:64:36:00:3C
Port 4 OK Bay 2 Port 6 00:22:64:36:00:3D
nwmgr
Name/ Interface Station Sub- Interface Related
ClassInstance State Address system Type Interface
============== ========= ============== ======== ============== =========
lan2 UP 0x00226436003C igelan 1000Base-SX lan900
lan0 UP 0x00226435CEF0 igelan 1000Base-SX
lan1 UP 0x00226435CEF1 igelan 1000Base-SX lan900
lan3 UP 0x00226436003D igelan 1000Base-SX
lan900 UP 0x00226435CEF1 hp_apa hp_apa
I am new to blades.
Does this lan config look ok?
lan900 contains lan1 and lan2 for failover purposes.
It looks to me like lan0&1 are the same physical lan card and lan2&3 are the same physical card.
Therefore, lan900 should contain a port from each card for redundancy.
The reason I ask is our Windows team seems to use 2 ports from the same card for a failover setup. Being new to blades I am not 100% clear at what I am seeing.
Innterconnect Bay1 on the enclosure contains lan0&2. Innterconnect Bay2 on the enclosure contains lan1&3.
So does it makes since to use lan1&2 to create lan900? (versus lan0&1) Or does it matter?
nwmgr -S apa
Class Mode Load Speed- Membership
Instance Balancing Duplex
======== =========== ========= ==================== ===========================
lan900 LAN_MONITOR LB_HS 1 Gbps Full Duplex 1,2
ioscan -funC lan
Class I H/W Path Driver S/W State H/W Type Description
===================================================================
lan 0 0/1/1/0 igelan CLAIMED INTERFACE HP PCI-X 1000Mbps Dual-port Built-in
lan 1 0/1/1/1 igelan CLAIMED INTERFACE HP PCI-X 1000Mbps Dual-port Built-in
lan 2 0/2/2/0 igelan CLAIMED INTERFACE HP PCI-X 1000Mbps Dual-port Built-in
lan 3 0/2/2/1 igelan CLAIMED INTERFACE HP PCI-X 1000Mbps Dual-port Built-in
from Onboard Administrator:
Mezzanine Slot Mezzanine Device Mezzanine Device Port Port Status Interconnect Bay Interconnect Bay Port Device ID
Embedded Embedded Ethernet
Port 1 OK Bay 1 Port 14 00:22:64:35:CE:F0
Port 2 OK Bay 2 Port 14 00:22:64:35:CE:F1
Port 3 OK Bay 1 Port 6 00:22:64:36:00:3C
Port 4 OK Bay 2 Port 6 00:22:64:36:00:3D
nwmgr
Name/ Interface Station Sub- Interface Related
ClassInstance State Address system Type Interface
============== ========= ============== ======== ============== =========
lan2 UP 0x00226436003C igelan 1000Base-SX lan900
lan0 UP 0x00226435CEF0 igelan 1000Base-SX
lan1 UP 0x00226435CEF1 igelan 1000Base-SX lan900
lan3 UP 0x00226436003D igelan 1000Base-SX
lan900 UP 0x00226435CEF1 hp_apa hp_apa
1 REPLY 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-28-2010 07:47 AM
05-28-2010 07:47 AM
Re: BL870 networking - APA
> It looks to me like lan0&1 are the same physical lan card and lan2&3 are the same physical card.
If I understand you correctly, 0&1 are ports on the same LAN controller and similarly 2&3. You can tell that from the MAC address, the two ports on the same LAN controller have similar MAC addresses.
There are two separate LAN controllers each with two ports. So you should use one LAN port from each controller (just like you have it now) to avoid SPF of one of the controllers.
http://h18004.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/12926_na/12926_na.html
If I understand you correctly, 0&1 are ports on the same LAN controller and similarly 2&3. You can tell that from the MAC address, the two ports on the same LAN controller have similar MAC addresses.
There are two separate LAN controllers each with two ports. So you should use one LAN port from each controller (just like you have it now) to avoid SPF of one of the controllers.
http://h18004.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/12926_na/12926_na.html
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP