- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Legacy
- >
- Networking
- >
- CIFS and WINS
Networking
1753739
Members
3800
Online
108799
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-17-2004 07:30 AM
тАО03-17-2004 07:30 AM
CIFS and WINS
We've recently installed some HP-UX systems runnign Samba for customers who do not have a corresponding Windows application server. In order to allow these systems to be available in the Network Neighborhood, we set the local_master variable to true in smb.conf. Our Windows guru is seeing the following performance problem now:
1) Some of the Samba servers have the LOCAL_MASTER set to true
2) When the Samba service starts, and at regular intervals thereafter, they register a <1E> record in the WINS database for the JDOSSN domain.
3) The <1E> record is a group name, and as such it should contain multiple values. When the Samba servers register, however, they are not being appended to the record. Instead, the record is being overwritten each time a Samba server sends a name registration request.
4) Because the <1E> record is constantly being overwritten, it does not contain entries for the domain controllers JDOSSNDC01 & JDOSSNDC02. This is causing significant slowness when logging in, browsing the network, and connecting to shared folders. The slowness is intermittent, because NetBIOS names are cached for 10 minutes.
5) Static entries are not overwritten by dynamic name registrations, so I created a static <1E> record with the address of the PDC emulator (JDOSSNDC01). This resolved the problems with slowness, but I have no idea how it will affect the Samba servers. We need to check and see if we can still browse the shares on the Unix boxes.
B8725AA HP CIFS Server A.01.10 is used. (Based on Samba 2.2.8a.) Windows Server is 2003. Anyone seen anything like this before?
1) Some of the Samba servers have the LOCAL_MASTER set to true
2) When the Samba service starts, and at regular intervals thereafter, they register a <1E> record in the WINS database for the JDOSSN domain.
3) The <1E> record is a group name, and as such it should contain multiple values. When the Samba servers register, however, they are not being appended to the record. Instead, the record is being overwritten each time a Samba server sends a name registration request.
4) Because the <1E> record is constantly being overwritten, it does not contain entries for the domain controllers JDOSSNDC01 & JDOSSNDC02. This is causing significant slowness when logging in, browsing the network, and connecting to shared folders. The slowness is intermittent, because NetBIOS names are cached for 10 minutes.
5) Static entries are not overwritten by dynamic name registrations, so I created a static <1E> record with the address of the PDC emulator (JDOSSNDC01). This resolved the problems with slowness, but I have no idea how it will affect the Samba servers. We need to check and see if we can still browse the shares on the Unix boxes.
B8725AA HP CIFS Server A.01.10 is used. (Based on Samba 2.2.8a.) Windows Server is 2003. Anyone seen anything like this before?
--
Jeff Traigle
Jeff Traigle
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-01-2004 04:33 AM
тАО09-01-2004 04:33 AM
Re: CIFS and WINS
As far as I know CIFS does not work on win2003 just yet. All I know is that it works on win 2000 server but not on 2003.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-07-2004 08:25 PM
тАО10-07-2004 08:25 PM
Re: CIFS and WINS
Hello,
Are the CIFS Server configured as a Primary Domain controller or a member server?
What about if you re-run the samba_setup again and say NO to WINS? what will happen?
Also, have you considered using SFU instead?
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/sfu/downloads/default.asp
Thought to throw my $0.2 cents
Are the CIFS Server configured as a Primary Domain controller or a member server?
What about if you re-run the samba_setup again and say NO to WINS? what will happen?
Also, have you considered using SFU instead?
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/sfu/downloads/default.asp
Thought to throw my $0.2 cents
"Attitudes are contagious, is yours worth catching"/ My first point was given by SEP on January 31, 2003
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-08-2004 02:44 AM
тАО10-08-2004 02:44 AM
Re: CIFS and WINS
One of the Windows guys dug into this more and it actually turned out to be a problem resulting from WINS being bound to both interfaces on the Win2k3 servers. Some CIFS servers weren't showing up in the browse list as a result of this configuration also. Not sure of all the details since I avoid Windows as much as possible, but it's been working a few months since he changed the binding.
--
Jeff Traigle
Jeff Traigle
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP