- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Legacy
- >
- Networking
- >
- NC7771 Teaming help - throughput
Networking
1753846
Members
7773
Online
108807
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-12-2006 01:19 AM
тАО04-12-2006 01:19 AM
I have a backup server with 2 dedicated NC7771 nics. When I team them the roles come up as: card 1 - Tx/Rx and card 2 - TxOnly. As this is a server which receives alot of data (rx) rather than send (tx), does anyone have any ideas for getting the most out of them. I cant seem to be able to change the roles on the settings I have selected.
Any help greatly appreciated,
Rgds,
Mark.
Any help greatly appreciated,
Rgds,
Mark.
Solved! Go to Solution.
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-12-2006 02:41 PM
тАО04-12-2006 02:41 PM
Solution
Mark:
Teaming is very dependant on what the network cards themselves are capable of doing. For example, as far as I know, not any two cards can be teamed. Typically it's server-based cards like the NC7771. We use the NC7781 on our server and it is Teaming capable but I can't imagine it being too different than the NC7771.
If your switch is Fast EtherChannel (Cisco) or Trunking (HP Procurve) capable you can enable a feature that allows the same MAC or IP address to be bound to two or four Fast Ethernet or Gigabit Ethernet NICs, providing parallel links. When this works, networking throughput can be quite fast.
What I've typically seen when setting up Teaming for Load Balancing (as opposed to failover) is you can configure either it for Transmit Load Balancing or Switch-Assisted Load Balancing. Transmit Load Balancing is load balanced for outgoing traffic only (i.e. TX). Switch-Assisted Load Balancing is load balanced for both incoming and outgoing traffic. What is important is the switch MUST be able to support this feature.
Sounds like you've basically got it set up as Transmit Load Balanced.
A few teaming tips to pass on:
1) Update the NIC drivers. Critical since a lot of what Teaming can and can't do is controlled by these drivers.
2) Not required but suggested you fix the IP address of the server's NIC cards and not rely on DHCP for an IP address
3) Not required but suggested you fix the speed of the cards. Do not use Auto Negotiate but set speed and duplex manual (e.g. 100 Mb/s Full-Duplex.
4) Check switch ports where the cards are plugged in. Configured correctly? Same speed and duplex? Is EtherChannel or Trunking enabled?
Good luck.
Rob
Teaming is very dependant on what the network cards themselves are capable of doing. For example, as far as I know, not any two cards can be teamed. Typically it's server-based cards like the NC7771. We use the NC7781 on our server and it is Teaming capable but I can't imagine it being too different than the NC7771.
If your switch is Fast EtherChannel (Cisco) or Trunking (HP Procurve) capable you can enable a feature that allows the same MAC or IP address to be bound to two or four Fast Ethernet or Gigabit Ethernet NICs, providing parallel links. When this works, networking throughput can be quite fast.
What I've typically seen when setting up Teaming for Load Balancing (as opposed to failover) is you can configure either it for Transmit Load Balancing or Switch-Assisted Load Balancing. Transmit Load Balancing is load balanced for outgoing traffic only (i.e. TX). Switch-Assisted Load Balancing is load balanced for both incoming and outgoing traffic. What is important is the switch MUST be able to support this feature.
Sounds like you've basically got it set up as Transmit Load Balanced.
A few teaming tips to pass on:
1) Update the NIC drivers. Critical since a lot of what Teaming can and can't do is controlled by these drivers.
2) Not required but suggested you fix the IP address of the server's NIC cards and not rely on DHCP for an IP address
3) Not required but suggested you fix the speed of the cards. Do not use Auto Negotiate but set speed and duplex manual (e.g. 100 Mb/s Full-Duplex.
4) Check switch ports where the cards are plugged in. Configured correctly? Same speed and duplex? Is EtherChannel or Trunking enabled?
Good luck.
Rob
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-13-2006 02:06 AM
тАО04-13-2006 02:06 AM
Re: NC7771 Teaming help - throughput
Hey - thanks Rob for taking the time to reply and sharing your knowledge, thats great.
I'm working on a gigabit backup LAN and I am trying to get the best throughputs possible, so I will look into what you have suggested. Its a Cisco 3750.
I did manage to bring it all tumbling down by setting some of the client nics to a higher frame size.... Currently reversing those settings.
Thanks again Rob.
I'm working on a gigabit backup LAN and I am trying to get the best throughputs possible, so I will look into what you have suggested. Its a Cisco 3750.
I did manage to bring it all tumbling down by setting some of the client nics to a higher frame size.... Currently reversing those settings.
Thanks again Rob.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО04-13-2006 03:23 AM
тАО04-13-2006 03:23 AM
Re: NC7771 Teaming help - throughput
Mark,
As far as what NICs can be teamed together, we support teaming (using HP's Teaming driver) with any combination of HP ProLiant NC series adapters.
As far as information on what team types is best for you, I did a brain dump in a whitepaper specifically for HP teaming. It runs about 80 pages but is organized. Specifically, I recommend you look at figure 3-5 "What type of NIC Team do I need?" flowchart. It will help you decide the team type. From there, you can read more about that specific team type along with configuration guidelines.
Teaming Whitepaper link:
ftp://ftp.compaq.com/pub/products/servers/networking/TeamingWP.pdf
Best regards,
-sean
As far as what NICs can be teamed together, we support teaming (using HP's Teaming driver) with any combination of HP ProLiant NC series adapters.
As far as information on what team types is best for you, I did a brain dump in a whitepaper specifically for HP teaming. It runs about 80 pages but is organized. Specifically, I recommend you look at figure 3-5 "What type of NIC Team do I need?" flowchart. It will help you decide the team type. From there, you can read more about that specific team type along with configuration guidelines.
Teaming Whitepaper link:
ftp://ftp.compaq.com/pub/products/servers/networking/TeamingWP.pdf
Best regards,
-sean
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP