- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Legacy
- >
- Networking
- >
- Strange one: Browsing SMB shares takes ages on XP
Networking
1752679
Members
5671
Online
108789
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-15-2003 05:50 PM
тАО01-15-2003 05:50 PM
Strange one: Browsing SMB shares takes ages on XP
Hey All,
I've got a strange one: On XP SP1 machines, browsing network shares with lots of files / folders takes a really long time, but if you rebuild the SAME machine as NT4 SP6a (so you are on the same network segment and no hardware differences or addressing differences) you can browse the same network shares without delay.
It's a TCP/IP based fully switched 100Mb Full Duplex network.
Any ideas?
I've got a strange one: On XP SP1 machines, browsing network shares with lots of files / folders takes a really long time, but if you rebuild the SAME machine as NT4 SP6a (so you are on the same network segment and no hardware differences or addressing differences) you can browse the same network shares without delay.
It's a TCP/IP based fully switched 100Mb Full Duplex network.
Any ideas?
Life would be so much easier if we just had the source code.
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-29-2003 08:51 PM
тАО01-29-2003 08:51 PM
Re: Strange one: Browsing SMB shares takes ages on XP
David:
Consider this Microsoft KnowledgeBase article: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;315237
and this one, especially if you use ICS or Remote Access: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;316666
and this one if you have a server or Domain Controller: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;331519
Hope this helps!
Roger
Consider this Microsoft KnowledgeBase article: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;315237
and this one, especially if you use ICS or Remote Access: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;316666
and this one if you have a server or Domain Controller: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;331519
Hope this helps!
Roger
Make a great day!
Roger
Roger
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-29-2003 09:14 PM
тАО01-29-2003 09:14 PM
Re: Strange one: Browsing SMB shares takes ages on XP
Thanks Roger,
Unfortunately neither options had much difference.
I thought the first one might be it (Q315237). But alas, no. I added the TcpWindowSize value & rebooted - but to no effect.
The second is NA as this is not via ICS or Remote (anything).
Third option got me thinking as I have modified the local policy & how communications are signed. Different combinations of enabling / disabling signed and or encrypted communications didn't make a difference.
I'll just have to keep at it.
Regards,
David.
Unfortunately neither options had much difference.
I thought the first one might be it (Q315237). But alas, no. I added the TcpWindowSize value & rebooted - but to no effect.
The second is NA as this is not via ICS or Remote (anything).
Third option got me thinking as I have modified the local policy & how communications are signed. Different combinations of enabling / disabling signed and or encrypted communications didn't make a difference.
I'll just have to keep at it.
Regards,
David.
Life would be so much easier if we just had the source code.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP