- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- [1,1] vs [SYSTEM] ie. [1,4]
Operating System - OpenVMS
1748244
Members
3950
Online
108760
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-21-2008 12:45 PM
10-21-2008 12:45 PM
Re: [1,1] vs [SYSTEM] ie. [1,4]
re: Richard
> my auditors said either every file had a
> valid owner name
I'd have thought a much simpler, and more reliable way to comply with this demand would be to do as Art and Jan suggested -create a UAF record for [1,1] with a valid name in the Owner field.
That way you don't have to modify any files, and you don't need to concern yourself with missing anything. Everyone is happy and you solve the problem for all time with a single command (including upgrades, patches and other events that might introduce new files or devices with [1,1] ownership)
> my auditors said either every file had a
> valid owner name
I'd have thought a much simpler, and more reliable way to comply with this demand would be to do as Art and Jan suggested -create a UAF record for [1,1] with a valid name in the Owner field.
That way you don't have to modify any files, and you don't need to concern yourself with missing anything. Everyone is happy and you solve the problem for all time with a single command (including upgrades, patches and other events that might introduce new files or devices with [1,1] ownership)
A crucible of informative mistakes
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-22-2008 02:57 PM
10-22-2008 02:57 PM
Re: [1,1] vs [SYSTEM] ie. [1,4]
Immaterial to create a [1,1] account now, I've long ago made the change to [1,4].
But thanks for the diversity of opinions.
But thanks for the diversity of opinions.
Sr. Systems Janitor
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP