- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- Re: Behaviour of F$TRNLNM
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-23-2007 11:08 PM
тАО01-23-2007 11:08 PM
It appears that F$TRNLNM("
Reason for this is that the second argument defaults to LNM$DCL_LOGICAL, which is defined (only) in SUPERVISOR mode in LNM$SYSTEM_DIRECTORY.
LNM$DCL_LOGICAL translates to LNM$FILE_DEV, which has both a SUPERVISOR and an EXECUTIVE mode version in LNM$SYSTEM_DIRECTORY.
If an EXECUTIVE mode version of LNM$DCL_LOGICAL is added (either to LNM$SYSTEM_DIRECTORY or LNM$PROCESS_DIRECTORY), F$TRNLNM behaves in a more natural manner; it will translate EXECUTIVE mode logical names normally.
Of course, I can add this second definition of LNM$DCL_LOGICAL at system startup, but I wonder: is there a compelling reason why it exists only in SUPERVISOR mode?
Any thoughts?
Regards,
Bart Zorn
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-23-2007 11:52 PM
тАО01-23-2007 11:52 PM
Re: Behaviour of F$TRNLNM
Purely Personal Opinion
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-24-2007 12:03 AM
тАО01-24-2007 12:03 AM
Re: Behaviour of F$TRNLNM
Although true, that is not the reason why LNM$DCL_LOGICAL is defined in SUPERVISOR mode.
In SYS$STARTUP:VMS$INITIAL-050_VMS.COM LNM$DCL_LOGICAL is defined with an explicit /SUPER qualifier.
I could just as easily have been /EXEC !
Bart
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-24-2007 12:31 AM
тАО01-24-2007 12:31 AM
Re: Behaviour of F$TRNLNM
It could just as easily have been /EXEC !
Bart
(I don't think I want to be /EXEC)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-24-2007 01:32 AM
тАО01-24-2007 01:32 AM
Re: Behaviour of F$TRNLNM
Then it's not the translation but the item to report.
When "executive" is after 2 "," it works fine.
Wim
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-24-2007 01:44 AM
тАО01-24-2007 01:44 AM
Re: Behaviour of F$TRNLNM
The word executive after 2 "," should indicate the index. "executive" is accepted but not used (???). So it does return exec logicals.
It's after 3 "," that you have the mode. And yes, it doesn't work.
Wim
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-24-2007 01:50 AM
тАО01-24-2007 01:50 AM
Re: Behaviour of F$TRNLNM
Fwiw
Wim
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-24-2007 05:34 AM
тАО01-24-2007 05:34 AM
Re: Behaviour of F$TRNLNM
$DEFINE/NOLOG/TABLE=LNM$SYSTEM_DIRECTORY/EXEC -
LNM$FILE_DEV - LNM$PROCESS,LNM$JOB,LNM$GROUP,LNM$SYSTEM,DECW$LOGICAL_NAMES
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-24-2007 10:13 AM
тАО01-24-2007 10:13 AM
Re: Behaviour of F$TRNLNM
(defining LNM$FILE_DEV in EXEC mode)
I'm not sure if that's a good idea... Note that by default, OpenVMS already defines both SUPER and EXEC mode translations for LNM$FILE_DEV:
$ show log/full/table=lnm$system_directory lnm$file_dev*
(LNM$SYSTEM_DIRECTORY) [kernel] [shareable,directory]
[Protection=(RWC,RWC,R,R)] [Owner=[SYSTEM]]
"LNM$FILE_DEV" [super] = "LNM$PROCESS"
= "LNM$JOB"
= "LNM$GROUP"
= "LNM$SYSTEM"
= "DECW$LOGICAL_NAMES"
"LNM$FILE_DEV" [exec] = "LNM$PROCESS"
= "LNM$JOB"
= "LNM$GROUP"
= "LNM$SYSTEM"
The reason is the EXEC mode translation is used for "trusted" logical name translation. The above is V7.3-2, in (much?) older versions, the exec mode translation only contained LNM$SYSTEM. It was relaxed to make it possible to have duplicate file names for installed images (circa V6, at the same time global section names got "mangled").
Although defining the logical name is most unlikely to break anything, it does allow a wider scope for trusted logical name translation, and thus potentially more tables that you implicitly trust. In the above case, the only difference is the DECW$ logical name table, which is *probably* trustworthy. Just be very careful about including any other logical name tables that might be writeable from non-trustworthy processes.
Re: Bart,
I think there's a bug here. F$TRNLNM is just a jacket for SYS$TRNLNM. If you call $TRNLNM from a non-privileged process you can correctly translate logical names by mode (I've tried it for user, super and exec, but not kernel since there's no simple way to create them!)
Please log a case with HP customer services to get it fixed!
Let me know if you want a simple test program.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-24-2007 10:24 AM
тАО01-24-2007 10:24 AM
Re: Behaviour of F$TRNLNM
$TRNLNM requires a table name. F$TRNLNM does not - it defaults to LNM$DCL_LOGICAL. Calling the system service with LNM$DCL_LOGICAL does not find exec mode logical names in the search path:
%SYSTEM-F-NOLOGNAM, no logical name match
The SSRM doesn't say that the table name logical name is required to be at least at MODE, but I guess it makes a kind of sense.
Simple workaround:
F$TRNLNM("