- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- Re: Decnet PDP11/93 (RSX11M+)
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-13-2008 06:10 AM
тАО12-13-2008 06:10 AM
Re: Decnet PDP11/93 (RSX11M+)
> but I don't know what means this parameters
> [...]
I know nothing, but some of these sound much
like the usual (VMS) RMS file attributes:
unsigned short int fat$w_rsize; /* record size in bytes */
unsigned long int fat$l_hiblk; /* highest allocated VBN */
unsigned long int fat$l_efblk; /* end of file VBN */
unsigned short int fat$w_ffbyte; /* first free byte in EFBLK */
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-13-2008 02:19 PM
тАО12-13-2008 02:19 PM
Re: Decnet PDP11/93 (RSX11M+)
Please post BOTH sets of attributes (identifying which is good and which is not).
- Bob Gezelter, http://www.rlgsc.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-14-2008 01:20 AM
тАО12-14-2008 01:20 AM
Re: Decnet PDP11/93 (RSX11M+)
The file decnet.txt is transferred by decnet to PDP.
The file kermit.txt is transferred by kermit to PDP.
The file pdp.txt is transferred by kermit and after convert to PDP format.
My target is to have the file like pdp.txt
Thanks
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-14-2008 05:14 AM
тАО12-14-2008 05:14 AM
Re: Decnet PDP11/93 (RSX11M+)
Two questions:
- How was the attachment converted to an archive? PKZIP does not seem to find it is a valid archive (I will check UNZIP on OpenVMS later).
- While the files are useful, it is more important to do a dump (DMP) of the file header (as Steve mentioned in his earlier post) and post BOTH the correct and incorrect results as an attachment. The outputs are simple text files, and can be edited into a single file, with which file is which identified, and then attached as a TXT file.
- Bob Gezelter, http://www.rlgsc.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-14-2008 05:39 AM
тАО12-14-2008 05:39 AM
Re: Decnet PDP11/93 (RSX11M+)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-14-2008 06:54 AM
тАО12-14-2008 06:54 AM
SolutionGrazie!
Interesting.
All three files transferred as Fixed length records. However, the record lengths (recorded in F.RSIZ) are different, as follows:
DECnet: 128
Kermit: 512
Converted: 60
Which is the correct record size?
- Bob Gezelter, http://www.rlgsc.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-14-2008 07:25 AM
тАО12-14-2008 07:25 AM
Re: Decnet PDP11/93 (RSX11M+)
Re-reading the original posting in this thread, the problem would be that COPY/IMAGE preserves the file precisely and treats it as a binary image.
KERMIT is transferring fixed length records. Depending upon which versions of KERMIT are being used, there are various possibilities.
To clarify what is happening, please post the precise commands used to send the file via KERMIT on both the client and server sides. Note that the settings may be set during KERMIT initialization and may not directly be part of the command sequence used for sending the files.
- Bob Gezelter, http://www.rlgsc.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-15-2008 10:16 PM
тАО12-15-2008 10:16 PM
Re: Decnet PDP11/93 (RSX11M+)
the file sent by Kermit has been transferred with parameter BINARY.
The file sent by DECnet has been transferred with the parmeter UNCONVERT.
Is there a parmeter to set on NFT to have the same resalt as the Kermit?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-16-2008 05:58 AM
тАО12-16-2008 05:58 AM
Re: Decnet PDP11/93 (RSX11M+)
Check the manual for the version of Pathworks that is being used.
I do not have the manuals near me at the moment, but recollection is that COPY/IMAGE and/or COPY/BINARY exists. Also, check the HELP text within NFT.
- Bob Gezelter, http://www.rlgsc.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-19-2008 11:32 PM
тАО12-19-2008 11:32 PM
Re: Decnet PDP11/93 (RSX11M+)
Thank you very much, for all people helped me, especially to Mr. Robert.