- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- Decnet Phase V Question
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-06-2009 12:27 PM
тАО02-06-2009 12:27 PM
Decnet Phase V Question
I've got Decnet Phase V installed on a 2-node Integrity Cluster, VMS 8.3. Having a problem with Set Host. When I 'Set Host 0' or Set Host anywhere, it works fine from one node. But if I do the same commands, Set Host 0 or Set Host anynode from the other node, this is what I get:
BHBO2>set h bhbo1
%RMS-F-DEV, error in device name or inappropriate device type for operation
BHBO2>set h 0
%RMS-F-DEV, error in device name or inappropriate device type for operation
I'm thinking I've got Decnet config screwed up somehow.
I just now saw that I only had a NET$PROXY. DAT in the root of the node that is NOT allowing me to set host, so I copied this to the sys$common:[sysexe] dir and redefined that logical on both nodes to point explicitly to sys$common:[sysexe]net$proxy.dat instead of to sys$system:net$proxy.dat, since I wasn't able to delete the copy from the root since it was being used.
So I may have multiple problems going on here caused by improper configuration by me.
Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Thx,
Warren
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-06-2009 12:39 PM
тАО02-06-2009 12:39 PM
Re: Decnet Phase V Question
my fast anwser is to run
$ @sys$manager:net$configure basic
( option number 1 ( entire configuration ))
to reconfig DECnet.
It will use current configuration as defaultanswer on all questions.
Hakan
ps. DECnet is like Printers.....no one wants to touch it ;-) ds
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-06-2009 12:48 PM
тАО02-06-2009 12:48 PM
Re: Decnet Phase V Question
WHen I do that, I get:
BHBO2>@sys$manager:net$configure basic
Copyright 2006 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.
DECnet-Plus for OpenVMS BASIC network configuration procedure
This procedure will help you create or modify the management scripts
needed to operate DECnet on this machine. You may receive help about
most questions by answering with a question mark '?'.
You have chosen the BASIC configuration option. This option enables
you to quickly configure your system by answering a few questions and
using most of the default answers. If you would rather do some specific
tailoring of your system's network configuration, you should invoke
NET$CONFIGURE.COM with the ADVANCED configuration option, ie:
@SYS$MANAGER:NET$CONFIGURE ADVANCED
* Do you want to continue? [YES] :
%NET$CONFIGURE-E-CKSREADERR, error reading checksum file
So this does not sound good. Possibly I have a corrupt checksum file. Any ideas how to correct or get around this?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-06-2009 03:16 PM
тАО02-06-2009 03:16 PM
Re: Decnet Phase V Question
Might be a good idea to do an ANAL/DISK on this system disk just to get an idea of what kind of shape it's in...
Then I might try to rename the *_SAVED.DAT and then run NET$CONFIGURE.COM again. Do you know for sure that your DECnet configuration requires using the p1 parameter of BASIC or ADVANCED? Not that I think its coded in the checksum file, just wondering if you knew the details of your DECnet configuration.
Bill
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-06-2009 03:41 PM
тАО02-06-2009 03:41 PM
Re: Decnet Phase V Question
Thanks, I didn't know about those checksum files.
Anyhow, I checked the date and times,and the date is right, but I truly don't remember the exact time. The LOCAL and COMMON versions of that Checksum file both have the same date and time, for what that's worth.
I did the anal of the sysdisk, and a lot of files, including NET$CHECKSUM_NCL_COMMON.DAT, had multiply allocated blocks.
I then did a repair.
Then copied the Local SAVED checksum file to higher version as new LOCAL and ran NET$CONFIGURE - with same results.
When I initially did the NET$CONFIGURE after installing the system, I did NOT use the BASIC or ADVANCED params.
Looks like i might have to call HP to get me out of this one, huh? Unless you have any more ideas - please, please !!!!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-06-2009 03:44 PM
тАО02-06-2009 03:44 PM
Re: Decnet Phase V Question
SYS$SYSROOT:[SYSEXE]NET$CHECKSUM_NCL_LOCAL.DAT
It is a VFC (DCL WRITE) file created on the time I did a decnet V setup for the box.
It starts out like:
$ type/page sys$system:NET$CHECKSUM_NCL_LOCAL.DAT
6%Local%SYSTEM%26-JAN-2009 22:14:03.61
NODEINFO:1.53,ENDNODE,49::,0,2,63.1023,576
ADAPTER:EIA0:CSMACD-0:CSMACD-0:1:0:0:EI/82558:1:1:0:0:0:0
ADAPTER:EWA0:CSMACD-1:CSMACD-1:1:0:0:DExxx/TULIP:1:0:0:0:0:0
:
There's that date.
For ucks I just randomdly changes a few values, but it did not return a checksum read error.
Still, I'd say rename that away and try again.
fwiw,
Hein.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-06-2009 05:37 PM
тАО02-06-2009 05:37 PM
Re: Decnet Phase V Question
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-06-2009 08:17 PM
тАО02-06-2009 08:17 PM
Re: Decnet Phase V Question
:-)
Right. What was I thinking? I wasn't. Somehow I assumed we were dealing with a program.
It's just a crappy command file that does that 'make believe' error message stuff, while hiding the real underlying error.
"%NET$CONFIGURE-E-CKSREADERR, error reading checksum file"
Hah! Just a piece of string that looks like an error.
What it really means is that there was an EOF error on the first read... an empty file.
The file in question can be F$parse("NET$CHECKSUM_NCL_COMMON","SYS$COMMON:[SYSEXE].DAT")
or
F$parse("NET$CHECKSUM_NCL_LOCAL","SYS$SPECIFIC:[SYSEXE].DAT")
Cheers,
Hein.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-06-2009 11:41 PM
тАО02-06-2009 11:41 PM
Re: Decnet Phase V Question
I did the anal of the sysdisk, and a lot of files, including NET$CHECKSUM_NCL_COMMON.DAT, had multiply allocated blocks.
Is your system disk a common system disk for both systems ? If so, you may have run both systems from the same disk at the same time without proper cluster communications. This is the most likely cause of getting multiple allocate blocks on a shard system disk !
To clean up the MULTALLOC errors, you need to delete all the files sharing the multiple allocated blocks and then do ANAL/DISK/REPAIR.
Consider to re-install OpenVMS or restore the disk from the last good backup, as you cannot trust the contents of ANY file, which had the MULTALLOC error.
Volker.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-08-2009 12:59 AM
тАО02-08-2009 12:59 AM
Re: Decnet Phase V Question
The configuration will start from scratch.
If you run NET$CONFIGURE without option, "BASIC" will be used.
Hakan