- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- Re: Experience with Availability Manager V2.6
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-11-2006 04:30 AM
тАО09-11-2006 04:30 AM
Re: Experience with Availability Manager V2.6
1 & 2, but "we" are (for all platforms) looking at moving towards configs where 3 would be just the thing. It would void another of the arguments for those that want to declare VMS unfit for today's enterprise.
Proost.
Have one on me.
jpe
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-11-2006 05:42 AM
тАО09-11-2006 05:42 AM
Re: Experience with Availability Manager V2.6
Barry
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-11-2006 10:06 AM
тАО09-11-2006 10:06 AM
Re: Experience with Availability Manager V2.6
Hi Barry,
Options 2 and 3 are most likely to fit us.
I'd prefer to see Option 3 with ports well enough documented that I can provide firewall configuration rules. Another nice to have would be to be able to specify allowed hosts/networks to accept connections from.
We define services at the firewall and in TCPIP for services like telnet/ssh access.
Andy Bustamante
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-11-2006 11:48 AM
тАО09-11-2006 11:48 AM
Re: Experience with Availability Manager V2.6
Initially we'll just need 1). I can see uses for the other situations, but right now, I need something that will run on V8.2 that will replace AMDS in our internal environment.
-Jeff
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-11-2006 06:45 PM
тАО09-11-2006 06:45 PM
Re: Experience with Availability Manager V2.6
Option 1 applies to my environment.
Regards,
Bart
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-11-2006 07:03 PM
тАО09-11-2006 07:03 PM
Re: Experience with Availability Manager V2.6
regards Kalle
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-11-2006 08:12 PM
тАО09-11-2006 08:12 PM
Re: Experience with Availability Manager V2.6
Purely Personal Opinion
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-12-2006 12:27 AM
тАО09-12-2006 12:27 AM
Re: Experience with Availability Manager V2.6
A bit of clarification please: Option 1) would still provide the authentication using the password provided by the current triplets implementation, correct?
-Jeff
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-12-2006 03:08 AM
тАО09-12-2006 03:08 AM
Re: Experience with Availability Manager V2.6
The security triplet system will still be in effect between the Data Analyzer and the Data Collector, regardless of where the packet comes from (direct on the LAN or through the Data Server).
The Data Analyzer will be able to connect to multiple Data Servers at the same time. The System Overview screen is reorganized a bit to show as level 1 the WAN/LAN connection, then the OpenVMS, Group and node level.
The Data Server will be able to support multiple Data Analyzer connections.
A filter level on the Data Server that has IP addresses or masks, and/or MAC addresses could be done. Is this an effective method of security?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-14-2006 01:36 AM
тАО09-14-2006 01:36 AM
Re: Experience with Availability Manager V2.6
Barry,
>>A filter level on the Data Server that has IP addresses or masks, and/or MAC addresses could be done. Is this an effective method of security?
The Triplet based security would be enough to use the WAN version in my environment. Even if I was external to our WAN, we would still use VPN to connect.
I can forsee using the above features in the future. MAC addresses would have to included as IP addresses change so frequently.
-Jeff