- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- Re: Fiber Channel tape drive doesn't work on one n...
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-13-2007 04:33 AM
тАО07-13-2007 04:33 AM
Re: Fiber Channel tape drive doesn't work on one node of a cluster only
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-13-2007 05:17 AM
тАО07-13-2007 05:17 AM
Re: Fiber Channel tape drive doesn't work on one node of a cluster only
>>>
That forced a full HBV Shadow merge (this was prior to HBMM!) of all 30+ volumes in the middle of the afternoon... I was not popular!
<<<
Oh yeah! Been there, also have those scars! In a police cluster running the callroom this did not win the popularity poll neither :-)
If you ever went to European DECUSes, or the 1999 San Diego one, you may remember me from the Engeneering Panel discussions.
I have brought up the mini-merge missing from SCSI devices every time since SCSI became popular, pointing out the giant step back from DSA devices.
... and I also was the one to ask the audience of that same panel during one of the first Bootcamps to loudly applaud the realisation of HBMM.
But. Ziggy, it need not be a cluster reboot.
A well-planned one-node reboot should be relatively unnoticeable for the users. And the accompanying inconvenience for system management should be part of the job. A good occasion to demonstrate to Management that your job _IS_ important :-)
Proost.
Have one on me.
jpe
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-13-2007 05:36 AM
тАО07-13-2007 05:36 AM
Re: Fiber Channel tape drive doesn't work on one node of a cluster only
By the way, HP people offered me to walk me thru booting DELTA and fixing some UCBs manually, but I said I was not brave enough. It is strange they don't have a fix for this common problem (it happened to me a few times before, but in a non-critical scenario). Let's hope the VMS engineering people come up with a patch, or something.
Brit and Rick: Yeah, we are talking Cerner Millennium here, with the world-famous "High Availability Toolkit".
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-13-2007 05:43 AM
тАО07-13-2007 05:43 AM
Re: Fiber Channel tape drive doesn't work on one node of a cluster only
I know this shouldnt be necessary, however did you follow the instruction in the "Description" section, i.e. get the wwid from a "io list_wwid" command, and then include the "/WWID=" qualifier. followed by and "IO AUTO"
SYSMAN> io replace_wwid /wwid=02000008:5006-0B00-0029-1683
SYSMAN> io auto
??
(Just trying to rule out everything.)
Dave
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-13-2007 05:51 AM
тАО07-13-2007 05:51 AM
Re: Fiber Channel tape drive doesn't work on one node of a cluster only
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-13-2007 11:53 PM
тАО07-13-2007 11:53 PM
Re: Fiber Channel tape drive doesn't work on one node of a cluster only
Just a couple of final questions,
Does the NEW tape device appear in a "IO LIST_WWID" display??
I was thinking that you might be able to create a new "mga" device with the new WWID, possibly by editing it into the SYS$DEVICES.DAT file directly, i.e. put in something like
[Device $2$MGA4]
WWID=
(just throwing out suggestions, but I suspect this will still require a reboot)
I think this is probably the end of my contribution -- the idea bucket is empty.
Wish you luck, and if you do find a solution be sure to post it.
Dave.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-16-2007 04:27 AM
тАО07-16-2007 04:27 AM
Re: Fiber Channel tape drive doesn't work on one node of a cluster only
Thanks for your efforts! Ziggy
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-16-2007 04:30 AM
тАО07-16-2007 04:30 AM
Re: Fiber Channel tape drive doesn't work on one node of a cluster only
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-16-2007 09:21 AM
тАО07-16-2007 09:21 AM
Re: Fiber Channel tape drive doesn't work on one node of a cluster only
Ziggy,
Please let us know of any further results of your escalation, in particualr, why you are getting the "device is active" message. VMS still seems to have a few bugs like this in the handling of tape devices, which are very annoying because their aren't satisfactory workarounds.
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »