- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- Re: GBLPAGFIL
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-09-2008 08:27 AM
тАО09-09-2008 08:27 AM
Just wanted to make a comparison with the value suggested by Autogen
Thanks
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-09-2008 08:40 AM
тАО09-09-2008 08:40 AM
Re: GBLPAGFIL
consider to run @SYS$UPDATE:AUTOGEN SAVPARAMS SETPARAMS FEEDBACK
$ MC SYSGEN HELP SYS_P GBLPAGFIL contains some explanation.
GBLPAGFIL is consumed by RMS (or RDB) global buffers or application global sections not connected to a file on disk.
Volker.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-09-2008 08:55 AM
тАО09-09-2008 08:55 AM
Solution$ ana/sys
SDA> eval @mmg$gl_gblpagfil
Hex = 00000000.0006BA92 Decimal = 440978 SDA$SHARE+39A92
SDA> Exit
SAM_super_info>mc sysgen sh gblpagfil
Parameter Name Current Default Min. Max. Unit Dynamic
-------------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ---- -------
GBLPAGFIL 442624 512 32 -1 Pages D
So on this node, GBLPAGFIL is 442624 and now we still have 440978 available.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-09-2008 10:20 AM
тАО09-09-2008 10:20 AM
Re: GBLPAGFIL
Could you please tell me by increasing this sysgen parameter, RMS global buffers be increased ?
Thanks
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-09-2008 10:36 AM
тАО09-09-2008 10:36 AM
Re: GBLPAGFIL
As Labadie and Vollker have already pointed out, GBLPAGFIL controls the amount of space available for global items (e.g., RMS Global Buffers) that are not otherwise associated with backing store.
The control for RMS Global Buffers is on a file by file basis. One of the ways of manipulating this is using SET FILE/GLOBAL_BUFFER=n.
Generally, AUTOGEN computes reasonable values, unless there is something that it has not been informed of (e.g., a file which has not been recently used).
- Bob Gezelter, http://www.rlgsc.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-09-2008 02:19 PM
тАО09-09-2008 02:19 PM
Re: GBLPAGFIL
Hmmm, maybe you can try to explain the problem before worrying about to detail for somethign that may or might not be related to a solution.
In an other topic (#1266726) you mention VASFUL.
In that topic RMS global buffer were not mentioned in the problem description.
Did they play a role? Is that what changed?
If so, PLEASE upgrade to OpenVMS 8.2 at least, but 8.3 preferrably where the RMS GLobal buffer potential problem with VASFUL is pretty much fixed. RMS was tought to remember its REGIONs and re-maps same sized global buffers back to the last space used for that size which fixes that for all.
Not to mention that in 8.3 RMS will use P2 space for desperate case... but you would eventually run out of P1 if you really eat into P2 over and over.
hth,
Hein.