- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- HP FTP vs Multinet FTP question
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-23-2011 02:38 PM
тАО02-23-2011 02:38 PM
HP FTP vs Multinet FTP question
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-23-2011 04:02 PM
тАО02-23-2011 04:02 PM
Re: HP FTP vs Multinet FTP question
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-23-2011 05:16 PM
тАО02-23-2011 05:16 PM
Re: HP FTP vs Multinet FTP question
Can you demonstrate/exhibit any of them?
> [...] 1. The Multinet ftp procedures (over
> a thousand) all use a DIR command. The HP
> TCPIP ftp equivalent is DIRECTORY (all
> spelled out). [...]
Where's the problem? Did you actually _try_
"DIR" and get a failure? "DIR" seems to work
for me:
alp $ tcpip show version
HP TCP/IP Services for OpenVMS Alpha Version V5.6 - ECO 5
on a COMPAQ Professional Workstation XP1000 running OpenVMS V8.3
alp $ ftp alp
220- Antinode FTP Server. Please be nice.
220 alp.antinode.info FTP Server (Version 5.6) Ready.
Connected to alp.antinode.info.
Name (alp.antinode.info:sms):
331 Username sms requires a Password
Password:
230 User logged in.
FTP> cd testu
250-CWD command successful.
250 New default directory is ALP$DKA0:[SMS.testu]
FTP> dir
200 PORT command successful.
150 Opening data connection for ALP$DKA0:[SMS.testu]*.*;* (209.98.249.184,27605)
Directory ALP$DKA0:[SMS.testu]
sms.DIR;1 1/16 25-MAY-2010 15:37:49 [SMS]
(RWE,RWE,RE,E)
Total of 1 file, 1/16 blocks
226 LIST Directory transfer complete.
167 bytes received in 00:00:00.06 seconds (2.61 Kbytes/s)
FTP>
quit
221 Goodbye.
alp $
DCL also has a "DIRECTORY" command, but "DIR"
normally works there, too.
As usual, showing actual commands with their
actual output can be more helpful than vague
descriptions or interpretations.
> [...] Changing everything by hand is not an
> option I'd like to consider at this time.
Write a computer program?
What, exactly, do these "ftp procedures" do?
There may be better ways to do the same work
which would depend less on the details of
your FTP client program. But with
approximately no useful information, it's
hard to know.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-24-2011 07:41 AM
тАО02-24-2011 07:41 AM
Re: HP FTP vs Multinet FTP question
As for the IP stack reporting that IPv6 is on even when no interfaces have been set to use IPv6 interfaces, that's "normal" for a stack that supports IPv4 and IPv6. An application that wants to support activity on both IPv4 and IPv6 will listen on IPv6 and the IPv4 code will check for an IPv6 listener if it doesn't find an IPv6 listener.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-25-2011 01:11 AM
тАО02-25-2011 01:11 AM
Re: HP FTP vs Multinet FTP question
It may be closer to the Multinet client, and is better than the HP equivalent in my opinion.
Rob.