1753528 Members
5323 Online
108795 Solutions
New Discussion юеВ

Re: High water marking

 
SOLVED
Go to solution
Wim Van den Wyngaert
Honored Contributor

Re: High water marking

John,

This seems to be the same discussion as in databases. First, only table locking was implemented. Next (on certain systems like HP3000 Image) there was chain locking. And finaly there was row locking.

It seems to me that VMS must block all IO's for the part being erased, not the whole directory or disk.

Sorry, but nobody can convince me to block all IO's.

Hein : it must have been a long queue because 11 seconds is a long time.

Wim
Wim
John Eerenberg
Valued Contributor
Solution

Re: High water marking

Wim,

I've been looking into this. The more I find, the more questions I have. I have found an inconsistent blocking of IO when doing a file create vs. /erase; sometimes the directory, sometimes the whole disk. This should not happen so I have logged a call with HP and the support folks are scratching their heads. ;-)
When I have more, I'll post it.

This impacts our usage of highwater marking and delete/erase and the lexical functions we use as well. So I am glad you raised this question!

john
It is better to STQ then LDQ
Wim Van den Wyngaert
Honored Contributor

Re: High water marking

Thanks John
Wim