- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- Re: IP router redundancy
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-09-2004 01:14 AM
тАО09-09-2004 01:14 AM
IP router redundancy
Now suppose I have a 2nd gateway B going thru the same interfaces.
I have setup the routing table in such a way that B comes for A. B is non-existing.
I do a ping of C, which is behind the routers A (and B but B is not there). Result : device timeout after about 15 seconds.
I redo the ping : working correctly.
I redo the ping : timeout.
So, there is no failover or is my IP bad configured ? Does anyone has pointers to a description of the algorithme ?
Wim
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-09-2004 02:28 AM
тАО09-09-2004 02:28 AM
Re: IP router redundancy
may be interesting use traceroute command.
Antonio Vigliotti
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-09-2004 02:32 AM
тАО09-09-2004 02:32 AM
Re: IP router redundancy
Since the node B doesn't exist, it will not respond to ARP and thus not to tracerout.
It concerns TCP 5.3 and I found in the release notes that it is normal behaviour (round robin without retry, thus 1 out of 2 usages fail).
But why ???
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-09-2004 03:11 AM
тАО09-09-2004 03:11 AM
Re: IP router redundancy
Purely Personal Opinion
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-09-2004 03:13 AM
тАО09-09-2004 03:13 AM
Re: IP router redundancy
Cost ? In IP ?
So, yes ...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-10-2004 12:13 AM
тАО09-10-2004 12:13 AM
Re: IP router redundancy
There is an RFC816 that specifies how to handle failed routes. E.g. by doing retransmit on the next available route.
Why is this not done on VMS ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-10-2004 12:17 AM
тАО09-10-2004 12:17 AM
Re: IP router redundancy
There no round robin is done. The first route is taken and that's it.
Wim
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-10-2004 08:24 AM
тАО09-10-2004 08:24 AM