- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- Re: Problem in backup
Operating System - OpenVMS
1753862
Members
7645
Online
108809
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-14-2010 09:17 AM
тАО01-14-2010 09:17 AM
Re: Problem in backup
Re Richard
>>>
$ BACKUP/VERIFY NUS$MKC600:JZIEGLER.SAV /BY_OWNER=[130,220] NUS$DKD400:[000000...]
<<<
Better make that
... NUS$DKD400:[*...]
or you might create an extra directory level of
000000.DIR
And IF you do that, it can be pretty convoluted to untie that knot.
As a general rule, always try to prevent using 000000 as directory in ANY command. Either specifying * or leaving it out totally will prevent (sometimes MUCH later) problems.
fwiw
Proost.
Have one on me.
jpe
>>>
$ BACKUP/VERIFY NUS$MKC600:JZIEGLER.SAV /BY_OWNER=[130,220] NUS$DKD400:[000000...]
<<<
Better make that
... NUS$DKD400:[*...]
or you might create an extra directory level of
000000.DIR
And IF you do that, it can be pretty convoluted to untie that knot.
As a general rule, always try to prevent using 000000 as directory in ANY command. Either specifying * or leaving it out totally will prevent (sometimes MUCH later) problems.
fwiw
Proost.
Have one on me.
jpe
Don't rust yours pelled jacker to fine doll missed aches.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-14-2010 08:51 PM
тАО01-14-2010 08:51 PM
Re: Problem in backup
> > Something like:
> > [...] /BY_OWNER= [...]
>
> Not really. HELP BACKUP /BY_OWNER explains
> the difference between /BY_OWNER as an input
> file-selection qualifier and as an output
> file (or save set) qualifier.
Regardless of what the help says, it does work as suggested by Richard. The /BY_OWER is treated as an input qualifier whether it is a disk or a save set, at least in 8.3 (this is the only one I have tested with, but I believe it has been this way for a long time). It still has limited usefulness, because it can only be used to match a single UIC, and using /NOBY_OWNER is the same as leaving the qualifier off. In other words, I don't think there is a way to choose files that don't belong to a UIC (the way that the ACCOUNTING utility can exclude PIDs)
See attachment for a reproducer.
Jon
> > [...] /BY_OWNER= [...]
>
> Not really. HELP BACKUP /BY_OWNER explains
> the difference between /BY_OWNER as an input
> file-selection qualifier and as an output
> file (or save set) qualifier.
Regardless of what the help says, it does work as suggested by Richard. The /BY_OWER is treated as an input qualifier whether it is a disk or a save set, at least in 8.3 (this is the only one I have tested with, but I believe it has been this way for a long time). It still has limited usefulness, because it can only be used to match a single UIC, and using /NOBY_OWNER is the same as leaving the qualifier off. In other words, I don't think there is a way to choose files that don't belong to a UIC (the way that the ACCOUNTING utility can exclude PIDs)
See attachment for a reproducer.
Jon
it depends
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-15-2010 03:36 AM
тАО01-15-2010 03:36 AM
Re: Problem in backup
> Better make that ... NUS$DKD400:[*...]
Oh yes, I just rearranged the original command without looking too hard.
Oh yes, I just rearranged the original command without looking too hard.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-15-2010 10:03 AM
тАО01-15-2010 10:03 AM
Re: Problem in backup
> Not really. [...]
Oops.
> Regardless of what the help says, it does
> work [...]
Right. My feeble brain was thinking "save"
and "restore", but BACKUP works with "input"
and "output", as the HELP says.
So, we seen to agree that a separate save set
for each user is not a good idea.
Oops.
> Regardless of what the help says, it does
> work [...]
Right. My feeble brain was thinking "save"
and "restore", but BACKUP works with "input"
and "output", as the HELP says.
So, we seen to agree that a separate save set
for each user is not a good idea.
- « Previous
- Next »
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP