- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- Re: Problem installing AXPVMS-VMS83A_MANAGE 4.0
Operating System - OpenVMS
1752781
Members
6319
Online
108789
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-27-2011 01:01 PM
тАО01-27-2011 01:01 PM
Re: Problem installing AXPVMS-VMS83A_MANAGE 4.0
re: patch advice on rebooting...
>Given that reality, the OpenVMS Engineering
>team should correct the admittedly long
>standing bad phrasing to something along
>the lines of what I suggested.
Historically, most patches recommend rebooting after installation. Historically. most people, like Steven, ignore the advice.
Be aware that the phrasing of the message is basically a "butt cover" (to use the American vernacular), written by lawyers and managers, not engineers. As you're aware, such people care very little about poor phrasing, indeed, they may PREFER it over accuracy, as it increases the difficulty in finding a "beyond reasonable doubt" conclusion about the precise meaning.
In the last decade or so, there have been one or two patches released where the instructions stipulate "you must reboot all nodes booted from the modified system disk IMMEDIATELY after installing this patch". If you see words to that effect, I would advise you follow them, as they were written by engineers who have identified real risks.
If you see the usual imprecise boilerplate waffle, you can probably ignore it, except to realise that if you do have problems after installing the patch, the words may be used as a legal shield to protect the guilty from any consequences.
>Given that reality, the OpenVMS Engineering
>team should correct the admittedly long
>standing bad phrasing to something along
>the lines of what I suggested.
Historically, most patches recommend rebooting after installation. Historically. most people, like Steven, ignore the advice.
Be aware that the phrasing of the message is basically a "butt cover" (to use the American vernacular), written by lawyers and managers, not engineers. As you're aware, such people care very little about poor phrasing, indeed, they may PREFER it over accuracy, as it increases the difficulty in finding a "beyond reasonable doubt" conclusion about the precise meaning.
In the last decade or so, there have been one or two patches released where the instructions stipulate "you must reboot all nodes booted from the modified system disk IMMEDIATELY after installing this patch". If you see words to that effect, I would advise you follow them, as they were written by engineers who have identified real risks.
If you see the usual imprecise boilerplate waffle, you can probably ignore it, except to realise that if you do have problems after installing the patch, the words may be used as a legal shield to protect the guilty from any consequences.
A crucible of informative mistakes
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-27-2011 01:11 PM
тАО01-27-2011 01:11 PM
Re: Problem installing AXPVMS-VMS83A_MANAGE 4.0
> Historically, most patches recommend
> rebooting after installation. Historically.
> most people, like Steven, ignore the advice.
No, Steven ignores the advice to reboot all
"other nodes in [his] VMS cluster" when only
one system has had its system disk changed by
a patch installation. Steven is actually
pretty good about doing a reboot of a patched
system when advised to do so.
The question is not whether a patch requires
a reboot of the patched system, it's whether
a patch requires a reboot of other cluster
members whose system disks have been left
unchanged by this patch installation.
> rebooting after installation. Historically.
> most people, like Steven, ignore the advice.
No, Steven ignores the advice to reboot all
"other nodes in [his] VMS cluster" when only
one system has had its system disk changed by
a patch installation. Steven is actually
pretty good about doing a reboot of a patched
system when advised to do so.
The question is not whether a patch requires
a reboot of the patched system, it's whether
a patch requires a reboot of other cluster
members whose system disks have been left
unchanged by this patch installation.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-30-2011 08:18 PM
тАО01-30-2011 08:18 PM
Re: Problem installing AXPVMS-VMS83A_MANAGE 4.0
Hi Robert,
>> The most likely correct interpretation is likely:
>> ...
Thats a good suggestion.
I have forwarded your suggestion to the concerened team here.
Regards,
Murali
>> The most likely correct interpretation is likely:
>> ...
Thats a good suggestion.
I have forwarded your suggestion to the concerened team here.
Regards,
Murali
Let There Be Rock - AC/DC
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP