I'd try altering the naming of REC1_LIST and rec1_list here to move away from case-sensitive naming. This on no evidence and no testing on OpenVMS I64.
Please also post your OpenVMS version and your C version and your patch level.
Log a case with HP Customer Support. Send them a minimal reproducer, with exact instructions for demonstrating your symptom (I like to send a self contained command procedure that starts from scratch automates all steps).
Make it clear what you believe to be incorrect, and what you believe the correct result should be. Also include a complete list of versions of all products (a PRODUCT SHOW PRODUCT listing will do).
This could be a compiler issue, a debug issue or a combination of the two. Make sure you've tried it with the latest compiler, and any DEBUG patches relevant to your OS version.
Note that there's a new field test C++ compiler. It might be worth trying your code against it.
You may want to use C++ coding style, not the scummy C style: typedef struct foo foo struct foo { int f1; foo *next; }; foo foo_variable;
Note: Every struct has a tag. Variables are declared separately from the struct. And to satisfy scummy C rules, you have a typedef for the same tag. The typedef can be after if you don't need that self-referential field.
>Pramod: I removed all the typedefs and added one more structure still there is a problem.
You still have some structs without tags.
>Bennett: This could be more of a code optimizer behavior then a DEBUGGER issue.
I doubt it. The optimizer wouldn't change the struct layouts, just cause it to print bad values that have been optimized away.
