- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- Re: RMS-F-BUG error
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-09-2003 09:16 AM
тАО10-09-2003 09:16 AM
Anyone know how to find out what this error means. I've looked all through the support web pages but cannot find anything about it. In the past there were some similar bugs for which there are patches available, but not with this newer version.
My next step will be to submit a problem report to HP, but I thought I'd try here first.
Thanks for any help or ideas.
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-09-2003 09:35 AM
тАО10-09-2003 09:35 AM
Solutionas for 7.3-1 and RMS first thing is to check if you are up on patches (UPD1 and RMS4 come to mind immediatly). Else it is known that timing changes in 7.3-1 exposed latent bugs in a number of applications. You actually might need to check your application. As for "a reboot" cures it, that might point into the direction of a cache issue. Can you pinpoint a particular file causing the trouble?
Greetings, Martin
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-09-2003 03:59 PM
тАО10-09-2003 03:59 PM
Re: RMS-F-BUG error
RMS-F-BUG is a non fatal bugcheck. There should be an error log entry that may give more information, or you could set the SYSGEN parameter BUGCHECKFATAL to force the system to crash when the condition is encountered. This is really the only way to get deeper diagnosis.
BUGCHECKFATAL is dynamic, so:
$ MCR SYSGEN
SYSGEN> USE ACTIVE
SYSGEN> SET BUGCHECKFATAL 1
SYSGEN> WRITE ACTIVE
SYSGEN> EXIT
Now repeat the action that generates the bugcheck. *YOUR* *SYSTEM* *WILL* *CRASH* so make sure you don't do it while anything important is happening. Also make sure you have a valid dump file.
As Martin has suggested, the latest UPDATE and RMS patches would be a good first step, but there are none that match this particular footprint.
That said, Condition code FFFFFFC0 decodes to "FTL$_BADGBH, Bad Global Section Header" The value in R0 will give more information.
If you're aware of any specific global sections that your application uses, they might be a place to start looking, but, by definition, this isn't a common or garden coding bug. There would need to be some privileged code hacking around in exec structures.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-09-2003 06:39 PM
тАО10-09-2003 06:39 PM
Re: RMS-F-BUG error
Martin & John say the right way to solve; also when you upgrade OS you shoul tune system parameter (with @AUTOGEN); some values, sometimes need change.
Bye
Antoniov
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-10-2003 02:18 AM
тАО10-10-2003 02:18 AM
Re: RMS-F-BUG error
(which it rather would not if you had a corrupted file on disk). If you can identify the section involved you might be able to delete it and get your application running without the reboot.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-13-2003 04:20 AM
тАО10-13-2003 04:20 AM
Re: RMS-F-BUG error
-Jeff
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-07-2003 07:51 AM
тАО11-07-2003 07:51 AM
Re: RMS-F-BUG error
Thank again!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-07-2003 10:02 AM
тАО11-07-2003 10:02 AM
Re: RMS-F-BUG error
When we do VMS upgrades, our DBA's re-link Oracle as an SOP.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-07-2003 02:46 PM
тАО11-07-2003 02:46 PM
Re: RMS-F-BUG error
John> If you're aware of any specific global sections that your application uses, they might be a place to start looking, but, by definition, this isn't a common or garden coding bug.
Don't just think 'global sections', think: Files with RMS Global buffers enabled.
There was a problem. To solve it, apply the RMS patch kit. As a workaround, you could diable RMS global buffers for the file active at the time of the crash. Best I recall from lunchtime conversation this proabbly also involved STOP/ID to trigger.
Antoniov> also when you upgrade OS you shoul tune system parameter (with @AUTOGEN); some values, sometimes need change.
That migth be useful. But it will NOT solve a system/process crash as reported here. VMS, and its core components, do NOT crash if it is mis-tuned. It will fail gracefully (or at least as graceful as the circumstnaces allow) this IMHO makes VMS the superior OS it is.
Mike Naime> Did you re-link your applications (executables) against the new version of VMS? When we do VMS upgrades, our DBA's re-link Oracle as an SOP.
It's more productive to play a game of solitaire, and less risky to your production environment. This makes NO SENSE. Only when upgrading from VMS 3.7 to 4.0 (give or take a version) did they a relink ever make any difference. This is VMS after all.
Actaully, I don';t really recall tehe exact versiona nd circumstances. It's a more than a decade ago, and it involved a minor performance enhancements, getting a direct versus indirect lingage or some such. Again, your system / process would not crash. And I' sure it was well documented at the time.
Folks blindly relinking are ill informed.
Good luck you all.
Hein.