- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- Re: Replacing Memory Channel with Gigabit Ethernet
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-23-2005 12:26 AM
тАО09-23-2005 12:26 AM
Re: Replacing Memory Channel with Gigabit Ethernet
Current have Memory Channel between 2 buildings 1200' apart. One node (2 node cluster) is moving 20 miles away. I've opted for using 2 gig-e connections. They will be point-to-point connections.
A suggestion I got from HP was to add the following line in SYSTARTUP_VMS.COM:
$ MCR SCACP SET LAN /PRIORITY=10 EWA
and since I will have two:
$ MCR SCACP SET LAN /PRIORITY=10 EWB
It's not a permanet setting, that's why it needs execute at startup.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-25-2005 10:25 AM
тАО09-25-2005 10:25 AM
Re: Replacing Memory Channel with Gigabit Ethernet
>An interesting factor. While 100 mb
>cards were recommended to hard code
>fast full duplex, as digital/hcompaq
>didn't conform to standards, on
>gigabit ethernet use autonegotiate.
Not true. There were no standards that digital/hcompaq didn't conform to! I don't know where it came from, but "Alpha's don't support autonegotiation" is now, and has always been, a myth.
The recommendation from HP Customer Support Centres is to use autonegotiate for ALL NICs and switch/hub ports. Hard setting your cards to 100/Full will NOT work if the switch port is set to auto.
The rule is that both NIC and switch port MUST be set the same. Either both hard set to a specific speed and duplex, or both set to autonegotiate. Since most modern switches and hubs will have autonegotiate by default, that's what you should set your OpenVMS systems to.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-25-2005 07:14 PM
тАО09-25-2005 07:14 PM
Re: Replacing Memory Channel with Gigabit Ethernet
"keep the GBE used for cluster traffic away from the network people - they often don't understand the availability requirements or the fact that its not IP and can cause trouble."
This is indeed a big problem. One might even consider using an other brand of switches (E.g. Digital Networks when the whole company is using Cisco). That way it may be easier to argue that these are part of the system and not the network.
YMMV,
Bart Zorn
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-26-2005 01:13 AM
тАО09-26-2005 01:13 AM
Re: Replacing Memory Channel with Gigabit Ethernet
Let me one again bring Tom Speake in the floodlight.
He once was Manager Disaster Tolerant Computing at Digital.
He did seminars on DT then.
His basic rule then was (and he still holds on to that as per our meeting again atlast Bootcamp):
The Cluster Interconnect is __NOT__ a network connection. It is the __SYSTEM BUS__.
-- even though it might be 800 KM long, and use network hardware --
We have fought hard to get it accepted, but have been VERY happy with it on more than one occasion!
Please, anybody, feel free to quote Tom on this, he still feels proud for every implementation that his text has helped to realise!
Proost.
Have one on me.
jpe
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-28-2005 05:15 AM
тАО09-28-2005 05:15 AM
Re: Replacing Memory Channel with Gigabit Ethernet
I'd be glad to discuss that with you. That was advise from the NSU group and years of getting clusters going.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО10-28-2005 08:03 AM
тАО10-28-2005 08:03 AM
Re: Replacing Memory Channel with Gigabit Ethernet
jzr
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »