- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- VMS Advanced server vs CIFS/SAMBA vs Patchworks
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-19-2007 04:11 AM
тАО09-19-2007 04:11 AM
VMS Advanced server vs CIFS/SAMBA vs Patchworks
We have a need to access VMS file system from a PC and a terminal server.
Is there a documenting that compares the functionality of Patchwork, VMS advanced server and CIFS and pros/cons of each options?
Which option is the most reliable and provides the best throughput while access large VMS file system?
Thanks a lot.
Arun Sanghvi
910-675-6130
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-19-2007 04:42 AM
тАО09-19-2007 04:42 AM
Re: VMS Advanced server vs CIFS/SAMBA vs Patchworks
PATHWORKS must be purchased from HP and has concurrent user licenses that must be paid for. It works and is completely supported by HP.
I did implement SAMBA for VMS in a previous environment as a test and the biggest caveat was user level security, which is no different than using SAMBA to share to Windows. A single user owns the mount and the permissions that come with it. If more than single user permissions are needed then you are stuck.
SAMBA did work as long as the config remained simple and security was a minimum.
If you want a fully supported reliable solution, that would be PATHWORKS.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-19-2007 05:09 AM
тАО09-19-2007 05:09 AM
Re: VMS Advanced server vs CIFS/SAMBA vs Patchworks
Thanks for your prompt response. Do you know of any documentation comparing Pathwork with VMS Advanced server?
Thanks.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-19-2007 05:25 AM
тАО09-19-2007 05:25 AM
Re: VMS Advanced server vs CIFS/SAMBA vs Patchworks
You should probably re-post this thread in the VMS forum instead of the HPUX forum.
Uwe and some other VMS gurus probably do not watch this forum. They have decades of experience with VMS. My VMS history only spanned 3 years of keeping it afloat.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-19-2007 08:34 PM
тАО09-19-2007 08:34 PM
Re: VMS Advanced server vs CIFS/SAMBA vs Patchworks
http://h71000.www7.hp.com/network/networking.html
The SAMBA kit is still fieldtest and should become production in october, I heard.
regards kalle
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-19-2007 09:35 PM
тАО09-19-2007 09:35 PM
Re: VMS Advanced server vs CIFS/SAMBA vs Patchworks
If Itanium then you have to use samba
If Alpha then you can use Advanced Server or Pathworks. Advanced Server is the successor to pathworks so I would use Advanced Server V7.3B
If VAX then I think you may be stuck with Pathworks V6.1
Purely Personal Opinion