device Access violation

[Jan van den Ende]

Lim,

If you follow Jon's idea, then where he wrote "LIM", use: TASADM
as that is the username that barfed in the original post.

But I prefer Willem's approach.

Proost.

Have one on me.

jpe

[Jon Pinkley]

I didn't see Willem's until after I posted my response. I agree that if TASADM is in a limited UIC group, his suggestion is better.

Or to make it dynamic for a single user

$ if f$edit(f$getjpi("","USERNAME"),"TRIM") .eqs. "''F$TRNLNM("SYLOGIN_VERIFY_USER")'" then set verify

Then to turn on verification for user TASADM

$ define/system SYLOGIN_VERIFY_USER TASADM

To turn off

$ deassign/system SYLOGIN_VERIFY_USER

Jon

[Phillip Thayer]

I didn't think you could simply comment out the f$verify function in DCL. I thought that was one of the only lexical functions that still gets executed even if the DCL line is commented out. Is that not the case?

[Jan van den Ende]

@ Phillip:

>>>
I thought that was one of the only lexical functions that still gets executed even if the DCL line is commented out. Is that not the case?
<<<

Well, partly correct!.

Compare

$ ! F$verify(x)
and
$ ! 'F$verify(x)

The only difference is the apostrophe right before F$, and the difference it makes is that the first is NOT, and the latter IS getting executed.

hth

Proost.

Have one on me.

jpe