- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- Re: new ip assign
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-25-2010 07:14 AM
тАО09-25-2010 07:14 AM
Re: new ip assign
Since You say EWA0 is malfunctioning, I would remove it as an IP interface:
TCPIP SET NOINTERFACE WE0
TCPIP SET CONFIG NOINTERFACE WE0
then shutdown/restart TCPIP.
I'm not really experienced in VMS TCPIP, but I can imagine the system tries to use the first interface enabled in the same subnet, the bad one.
Also check the routing tables
TCPIP SHOW ROUTE
Did You try to reach other destinations than the gateway in the same subnet ?
TCPIP SHOW ARP
shows eventually which ones are seen.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-25-2010 08:06 AM
тАО09-25-2010 08:06 AM
Re: new ip assign
is the interface raechable from a different system: ping the the new interface (using its IP address, not name).
If it responds, than it is a hint it is working, and should work also outgoing if used, i.e. after EWA0 is disabled.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-27-2010 09:50 PM
тАО09-27-2010 09:50 PM
Re: new ip assign
Suppose one site say EF0DS1 running on two LANs (LAN-A & LAN-B) at a remote location. The IPs for LANs are as followings:
EF0DS1 LAN-A ├в 172.16.136.74/26
EF0DS1 LAN-B ├в 172.16.166.74/26
Now EF0DS1 LAN-A became faulty and needs to be replaced so as it is mounted on a motherboard,We added a new Dual SCSI combo Ethernet card in PCI slot.We had that card spare in our stock so we choosed to used it.
Now as I already told it is a remote site,so before sending the card to there,I wanted to check the connectivity of that combo card on my plateform.As like the remote location DS10,I have a DS10 named EA0DS1,again running with two LANs(LAN-A LAN-B)The IPs are as followings
EA0DS1 LAN-A ├в 172.16.128.74/26
EA0DS1 LAN-B ├в 172.16.160.74/26
Now what I did I add my combo Ethernet card on my DS10 server(installed at plateform) and was able to see it in SHOW|MORE
EWC0 (newly installed combo card)
I assigned it a spare IP 172.16.128.111/26 set at FAST FD with LANCP and CORE Environment and INTERFACE options.I reset the DECNET TCPIP services after assigning IP to new card.I am able to see the counters increasing but surprisingly I am unable to ping my cisco switch/router(172.16.128.88/172.16.128.89)
Any Idea why it is not pinging ?
Regards,
Deepak Raheja
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-28-2010 11:00 AM
тАО09-28-2010 11:00 AM
Re: new ip assign
Last time You showed EWA0: and EWC0: both connected, and EWA0: still counting.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-28-2010 11:17 AM
тАО09-28-2010 11:17 AM
Re: new ip assign
Dan
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-28-2010 08:26 PM
тАО09-28-2010 08:26 PM
Re: new ip assign
No I didnot remove EWA0(172.16.128.74)it is working as LAN-A (with motherbaord DS10 port)at present situtaion is
EWA0-172.16.128.74/26(working as LAN-A)onboard ethernet
EWB0-172.16.160.74/26(working as LAN-B)onboard ethernet
EWC0-172.16.128.111/26(not working)External card.I used a spare IP from LAN-A series.
Is it requires to unassign EWA0 if I am using a same class spare ip in same machine(for e.g EWC0 here).In other words can't I use two same class ip to access same LAN/Switch ?
Waiting for yours valuable views.
Regards,
Deepak Raheja
I have correctly set the gateway,Dan
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-28-2010 10:38 PM
тАО09-28-2010 10:38 PM
Re: new ip assign
But how do You know EWC0 is not working ?
Since EWA0 and EWC0 is in the same subnet, I assume it will go over EWA0: as long this is working ( I assume LAN failover is not setup according to the interface names).
Is the ping to cisco "not working" t
he only problem, or is there no connection to x.x.128.* at all on the system with working EWA0: ? The LAN counters showed a lot of traffic, both incoming and outgoing.
Are other protocols (Decnet, cluster, LAT) active ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-29-2010 12:50 AM
тАО09-29-2010 12:50 AM
Re: new ip assign
When I am removing my LAN-A(172.16.128.74) cable,in that case I should be able to ping my LAN A swich.But it is not pinging however IO counters are increasing.
Is it require to activate some protocols too,yet the same machine is working fine with same class IP i.e LAN-A. or we have to activate the services for each individual physical device say LAN A port,LAN B port, LAN c port. Sorry,But I doubt..
In my sense we needs to activate the protocols for machine specific.doesnot matter how much cards we insert in machine.
Waiting yours feedback.
Regards,
Deepak Raheja
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-29-2010 01:26 AM
тАО09-29-2010 01:26 AM
Re: new ip assign
When I am removing my LAN-A(172.16.128.74) cable,in that case I should be able to ping my LAN A swich.
<<
No, since there is no LAN Failover, TCPIP will still trye to use EWA0:.Since You are not willing to disable interface WE0/EWA0 to prove that, I have no more ideas, somebody else ?
>>
Is it require to activate some protocols too,yet the same machine is working fine with same class IP i.e LAN-A. or we have to activate the services for each individual
<<
No, it was just a question: if e.g. DECnet would work, then the it proves the interface is o.k., but IP has a problem.
Also what was the answer to trying to access x.x.128.111 from the outside, i.e. ping from some other node ?
This would also prove the we2/ewc0 interface is o.k.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО09-29-2010 02:06 AM
тАО09-29-2010 02:06 AM
Re: new ip assign
I think I should unassign LAN A(172.16.128.74), & then I should check the newly installed card behaviour(172.16.128.111).(ofcourse you were already asked to do)
I will let you know the result after doing the said activity.
Keep in touch
Regards,
Deepak Raheja