- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- Re: port allocation class
Operating System - OpenVMS
1753518
Members
4882
Online
108795
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-26-2008 08:35 AM
тАО06-26-2008 08:35 AM
Re: port allocation class
Yes, but CLUSTER_CONFIG.COM does not support DV or DQ devices. Setting the port allocation class of these non-shared devices to 0 can be important to avoid device name conflicts in the cluster that would prevent MSCP serving.
So in this case the only options left are to EDIT SYS$DEVICES.DAT or use the SYSBOOT> SET /CLASS console commands. Personally I thinks editting a text file myself is safer than depending on console commands to do it for me. With the console command methood I won't even have a chance to look at the file before it is used for booting.
So in this case the only options left are to EDIT SYS$DEVICES.DAT or use the SYSBOOT> SET /CLASS console commands. Personally I thinks editting a text file myself is safer than depending on console commands to do it for me. With the console command methood I won't even have a chance to look at the file before it is used for booting.
I have one, but it's personal.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-26-2008 08:46 AM
тАО06-26-2008 08:46 AM
Re: port allocation class
Regarding the editing of SYS$DEVICES.DAT: i once wrote a DCL tool to standardize and automate the construction of this file based upon discovery of certain hardware that I was interested in. Initially it didn't work - though the records written by the tool were individually correct, the portion of the bootstrap that read the file wasn't interested in the VFC format that DCL used to create the file - it wanted carriage-return control (like the editors are want to use). I had to have the tool CONVERT the file after writing it with DCL. fwiw...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-26-2008 12:03 PM
тАО06-26-2008 12:03 PM
Re: port allocation class
more than enough information from y'all.
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP