- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- Re: sftp issues
Operating System - OpenVMS
1753706
Members
4708
Online
108799
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-18-2009 12:23 PM
тАО11-18-2009 12:23 PM
sftp issues
Does anyone know if sftp is going to act like a native vms utility instead of a nix port in future releases ?
Some examples
-Case sensitive
-No DIR or SHOW DEF command only ls and pwd ect
These are not a big deal, but it can get annoying at certain times.
----------------------------------------------
Here are some issues i encounter using sftp. I do not know if some settings are wrong but i am confused on the way sftp handles some requests.
All these examples are between the following two machines.
Client - VMS 8.3 TCPIP v5.6
Server - VMS 8.3 TCPIP v5.6- eco 4
I have two system logicals set up on the server side.
"FIX" = "DQB0:[FIX]" (LNM$SYSTEM_TABLE)
"BAS" = "DQB0:[BAS]" (LNM$SYSTEM_TABLE)
The protections/ownerships on the directories are the same. I am using a privileged account on both machines.
sftp> cd fix
DQB0:[FIX]
sftp> cd bas
CD failed.
DQB0:[FIX]
I can access the bas logical using the full path.
sftp> cd dqb0:[bas]
dqb0:[bas]
sftp>
--------------------
I also seem to have an 'ls' issue
(VMS dir command)
Directory DQB0:[FIX]
T.T;6 T.T;5
(sftp ls command)
sftp> ls fix:t.t
sftp>
The ls command, after thinking for a while just returns me back to the sftp prompt
---------------------------------------------
I also can not issue a get/put using a logical. I have to change to the directory i want to get/put from/to. Is this a sftp security feature ?
sftp> get fix:t.t
SshFCRecurse/SSHFC_RECURSE.C:362: File is "raw", and it needs to be parsed.
SshFCRecurse/SSHFC_RECURSE.C:297: Received error `syserr: no such file or direc.
fcr_parse_raw: fix/fix:t.t (src): no such file (server msg: 'syserr: no such fi)
SshFCTransfer/SSHFC_TRANSFER.C:2321: File list has 0 files.
This throws a file not found error, when i know the file exists.
It would be nice to be able to use logicals like you can in ftp.
For example:
ftp>get logical:file.ext logical:file.ext
Works on ftp where it doesn't on sftp
Some examples
-Case sensitive
-No DIR or SHOW DEF command only ls and pwd ect
These are not a big deal, but it can get annoying at certain times.
----------------------------------------------
Here are some issues i encounter using sftp. I do not know if some settings are wrong but i am confused on the way sftp handles some requests.
All these examples are between the following two machines.
Client - VMS 8.3 TCPIP v5.6
Server - VMS 8.3 TCPIP v5.6- eco 4
I have two system logicals set up on the server side.
"FIX" = "DQB0:[FIX]" (LNM$SYSTEM_TABLE)
"BAS" = "DQB0:[BAS]" (LNM$SYSTEM_TABLE)
The protections/ownerships on the directories are the same. I am using a privileged account on both machines.
sftp> cd fix
DQB0:[FIX]
sftp> cd bas
CD failed.
DQB0:[FIX]
I can access the bas logical using the full path.
sftp> cd dqb0:[bas]
dqb0:[bas]
sftp>
--------------------
I also seem to have an 'ls' issue
(VMS dir command)
Directory DQB0:[FIX]
T.T;6 T.T;5
(sftp ls command)
sftp> ls fix:t.t
sftp>
The ls command, after thinking for a while just returns me back to the sftp prompt
---------------------------------------------
I also can not issue a get/put using a logical. I have to change to the directory i want to get/put from/to. Is this a sftp security feature ?
sftp> get fix:t.t
SshFCRecurse/SSHFC_RECURSE.C:362: File is "raw", and it needs to be parsed.
SshFCRecurse/SSHFC_RECURSE.C:297: Received error `syserr: no such file or direc.
fcr_parse_raw: fix/fix:t.t (src): no such file (server msg: 'syserr: no such fi)
SshFCTransfer/SSHFC_TRANSFER.C:2321: File list has 0 files.
This throws a file not found error, when i know the file exists.
It would be nice to be able to use logicals like you can in ftp.
For example:
ftp>get logical:file.ext logical:file.ext
Works on ftp where it doesn't on sftp
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-18-2009 01:13 PM
тАО11-18-2009 01:13 PM
Re: sftp issues
Jason,
Log a case with your local customer support centre, requesting enhancements.
but the way HP seems to be treating OpenVMS these days, I wouldn't hold my breath :-(
Log a case with your local customer support centre, requesting enhancements.
but the way HP seems to be treating OpenVMS these days, I wouldn't hold my breath :-(
A crucible of informative mistakes
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-18-2009 08:07 PM
тАО11-18-2009 08:07 PM
Re: sftp issues
> Does anyone know if sftp is going to act
> like a native vms utility instead of a nix
> port in future releases ?
Of the future, it's hard to be certain, but
my money would be on it continuing to act
like what it is, namely UNIX software ported
(none too well) to VMS. My favorite:
alp $ sftp alp-l
@ SYS$MANAGER:ANNOUNCE.TXT
sftp>
> -No DIR or SHOW DEF command only ls and pwd
> ect
That's "etc.", as in "et cetera". In old
books, where people still knew what they were
abbreviating, you may see "et c.", which I
find charming. In the race for most
annoying, it's a tie between people who say
"eck cetera" and people who say "and et
cetera". ("And eck cetera" beats both of
those, of course.) But I digress.
I've given up, and adapted. I don't know why
your apparently similar "fix" and "bas" don't
behave the same, but I have no obvious
trouble when I use UNIX-like path notation.
For example:
ALP $ show logical /system aftp*
(LNM$SYSTEM_TABLE)
"AFTP" = "HOME_ANON:[ANONYMOUS]"
"AFTP_ROOT" = "HOME_ANON:[ANONYMOUS.]"
sftp> ls -l /aftp/announce.txt
-rwxr-xr-x 1 4 1 41 Mar 12 2005 ANNOUNCE.TXT;2*
sftp> ls -l /aftp_root/info-zip/os.sh
-rwxr-xr-x 1 4 1 1936 Apr 5 0:34 OS.SH;2*
When (imprisoned) in Rome, ...
I don't expect VMS file specs to work in this
environment, so I don't even try. Call me
fatalistic.
> like a native vms utility instead of a nix
> port in future releases ?
Of the future, it's hard to be certain, but
my money would be on it continuing to act
like what it is, namely UNIX software ported
(none too well) to VMS. My favorite:
alp $ sftp alp-l
@ SYS$MANAGER:ANNOUNCE.TXT
sftp>
> -No DIR or SHOW DEF command only ls and pwd
> ect
That's "etc.", as in "et cetera". In old
books, where people still knew what they were
abbreviating, you may see "et c.", which I
find charming. In the race for most
annoying, it's a tie between people who say
"eck cetera" and people who say "and et
cetera". ("And eck cetera" beats both of
those, of course.) But I digress.
I've given up, and adapted. I don't know why
your apparently similar "fix" and "bas" don't
behave the same, but I have no obvious
trouble when I use UNIX-like path notation.
For example:
ALP $ show logical /system aftp*
(LNM$SYSTEM_TABLE)
"AFTP" = "HOME_ANON:[ANONYMOUS]"
"AFTP_ROOT" = "HOME_ANON:[ANONYMOUS.]"
sftp> ls -l /aftp/announce.txt
-rwxr-xr-x 1 4 1 41 Mar 12 2005 ANNOUNCE.TXT;2*
sftp> ls -l /aftp_root/info-zip/os.sh
-rwxr-xr-x 1 4 1 1936 Apr 5 0:34 OS.SH;2*
When (imprisoned) in Rome, ...
I don't expect VMS file specs to work in this
environment, so I don't even try. Call me
fatalistic.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP