- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- Re: silly $GETQUI bug and work-around
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-07-2006 06:47 PM
тАО11-07-2006 06:47 PM
Re: silly $GETQUI bug and work-around
what kind of contest is this ? Are we going to do quality testing for HP OpenVMS engineering here ? Believe, me, I'm up to that ;-)
When converting 20-NOV-2006 22:02:14.40 to a quadword time value, you might note, that the low order longword becomes all zero.
The code in [CLIUTL]QUEMANSHO tests whether a RETENTION_TIME is specified, but only tests the low order longword of the quadword time value.
You've found the symptom of this bug, I found the actual bug in the source code. So 90% of the work is done. Now it would just take someone with a support contract or access to PTR to report this problem officially and wait for OpenVMS engineering to fix it.
Volker.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-07-2006 07:06 PM
тАО11-07-2006 07:06 PM
Re: silly $GETQUI bug and work-around
If you *REALLY* think it's worth it (maybe because most of the work is already done by Volker) then I'm sure someone will log a support call (maybe me) or engineering might take note (ye olde Mr DCL did!)
Just post exactly what needs to be said...
J.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-08-2006 06:55 AM
тАО11-08-2006 06:55 AM
Re: silly $GETQUI bug and work-around
Volker, no this second bug is not that simple. It does not occur for all binary time values with a zero low-order long word:
DBG> exam/hex r0
%R0: 00A5F20000000000
DBG> exam/date r0
%R0: 22-NOV-2006 20:48:17.11
$ SUBMIT JUNK /RETAIN=UNTIL="22-NOV-2006 20:48:17.11"
Job JUNK (queue SYS$BATCH, entry 5009500) pending
$ SHOW ENTRY/FULL '$ENTRY
Entry Jobname Username Blocks Status
----- ------- -------- ------ ------
5009500 JUNK SYSTEM Pending (queue stopped)
On stopped batch queue SYS$BATCH
Submitted 8-NOV-2006 19:29:14.17 /PRIORITY=100
/RETAIN=UNTIL="22-NOV-2006 20:48"
File: _$1$DGA111:[DSKA.COM.SYSTEM]JUNK.COM;3
If it was based on a zero low-order long word the bug would occur for any value that is a multple of delta time interval of 0-07:09.49 (binary time value of negative 2**32). As stated above the delta interval for this problem is actually 15-12:49:37.28, whose binary value is negative (2**32)x3125.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-11-2006 07:38 PM
тАО11-11-2006 07:38 PM
Re: silly $GETQUI bug and work-around
I give up for now. To troubleshoot this effectively, one would need to run the code with the debugger. Let's leave this to OpenVMS engineering...
Volker.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-13-2006 02:58 AM
тАО11-13-2006 02:58 AM
Re: silly $GETQUI bug and work-around
both problems have now been logged via PTR (official OpenVMS problem tracking tool) at HP:
75-13-1804 for the /retain=until problem
75-13-1805 for the cpu_limit problems
You may consider to close this thread.
Volker.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО11-13-2006 05:20 AM
тАО11-13-2006 05:20 AM
Re: silly $GETQUI bug and work-around
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »