Aruba & ProVision-based
1753750 Members
5315 Online
108799 Solutions
New Discussion

Pinging HP switches (HP 7500, 5400 and 2620) acceptable or not?

 
LeonardB
New Member

Pinging HP switches (HP 7500, 5400 and 2620) acceptable or not?

Good day forum, we are end users on a mix of HP7500, 5400 and 2620 switches (60+ qty) in a standalone network environment, configured with multiple VLAN's.

For us to troubleshoot field device network communications issues, we are required to ping (or Fping to log the results) devices every now and then. As part of the general troubleshooting process, we also ping the next device in line, which is the switch.

We have now been instructed by our service providers that we are NEVER to ping the switches, as the switches have been configured to ignore ping requests or respond as the lowest priority. We should only ping through the switch. We do not have access to the Network Management Software, and use ping to assist us in determining when field devices go offline and also check whether the associated switch goes offline at the same time\duration or not. We are not monitoring performance of the replies, purely connectivity.

 

Questions:

1. Will pinging a switch at 1 second intervals affect the overall performance of the network if it is done from up to 3 PC's from 3 switch locations at a time?

2. Is there any documented rule that stipulates that HP switches should NEVER be pinged?

3. If pinging a switch is not acceptable, what other tool can we use to check whether the switch is communicating to the rest of the network and log the results when it happens after hours (taking into consideration that we do not have access into the administration of the network - NMS or internal switch logs).

 

Your soonest response would be greatly appreciated.

 

Leonard.

1 REPLY 1
Chrisd131313
Trusted Contributor

Re: Pinging HP switches (HP 7500, 5400 and 2620) acceptable or not?

Hi LeonardB,

 

Here's a doc that HP released some time ago relating to pinging switches...

 

Inconsistent Ping Response

 

Basically, if you want to use ping to check if a switch is up or down then that is fine. As the documet states, pinging the switch will have  a lower priority to respond than traffic passing through the switch - this is to stop ping of death attacks against the switch. It is always advisable to ping an end device to collect latency response times, as switched traffic takes higher priorityover management traffic, but for just seeing if a switch is up or down pinging it is fine, unless, as your network people state, ping responses on the switch are disabled. If your switch is dropping pings then you either have a problem with the switch itself or the CPU load is so high that the pings to the switch are dropped because it can't respond in a timely fashion.

 

To answer your questions...

 

1. No not at all, the amount of pings you are talking about is insignificant to the amount of packets the switch will be switching in a real world scenario.

 

2. No, not that I am aware of.. Ping is the first basic method used to probe any device on the network so to say they should never be pinged is incorrect.

 

3. Without being able to configure any other manageent protocls on the swithc (SNMP/logging to NMS,Syslogger/Etc) you are somewhat limited. Maybe some other guys here have some ideas, but I cannot think of any.

 

The only thing I would say is that pinging the management IP of a switch does not give you the view that traffic is being switched correctly. To monitor that you would need to ping the end devices attached to the ports on that switch. Pinging the management IP will just confirm that the management IP is responding, or subnet gateway if it is used as a L3 router, and the physical switch is online - or subnet gateway if it is used as a L3 router.

 

HTH.

 

-----------------------------------------------------

Don't forget to mark a post resolved if your question was answered.