- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Switching and Routing
- >
- Aruba & ProVision-based
- >
- Spanning tree in a dual network environment
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-24-2017 08:33 AM
08-24-2017 08:33 AM
Spanning tree in a dual network environment
Hi-
I work in a municipality where the Town side and the School side coexist on the same network. We are basically separate with The Town side and school side having separate core switches connected via a fiber patch cable. For the most part, traffic is not allowed to flow between these two core switches.
The school core switch is a 5406zl with spanning tree enabled with a spanning-tree priority of 0. The Town side is also a 5406zl but does not have spanning tree enabled and I had my first loop last week (not fun). I would like to enable spanning tree and make my switch a priority 0 as well. The only interaction is for sixmachines to be routed from their network into my network for the accounting software we use.
The Town switch has this in it's config file:
no spanning-tree bpdu-throttle
spanning-tree mode rapid-pvst
spanning-tree force-version rstp-operation
The School switch has this:
spanning-tree
spanning-tree Trk2 priority 4
spanning-tree Trk6 priority 4
spanning-tree Trk7 priority 4
spanning-tree config-name "STONEHAM-TOR"
spanning-tree instance 1 vlan 155
spanning-tree instance 1 Trk2 priority 4
spanning-tree instance 1 Trk6 priority 4
spanning-tree instance 1 Trk7 priority 4
spanning-tree priority 0
Is it safe to make my core switch a priority 0?
Thanks in advance.
-Tom
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-24-2017 10:19 AM
08-24-2017 10:19 AM
Re: Spanning tree in a dual network environment
Maybe I should rephrase my question.
If I have one core switch that is a hub for several buildings (spokes) and a second core switch that is a hub for several buildings (spokes), and these two core switches are connected together, is it ok to have both switches a priority 0 if none of the member switches can reach the other core without passing through their core first?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-28-2017 12:00 AM
08-28-2017 12:00 AM
Re: Spanning tree in a dual network environment
The link between the two core switches should be a routed link, so spanning-tree should be irrelevant, and you can make each of them whatever priority you like.
In other words, you should not span any VLAN between the two cores that is assigned to any other ports on either of the cores.