- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- HPE ProLiant
- >
- ProLiant Servers (ML,DL,SL)
- >
- Re: Array Configuration!!
ProLiant Servers (ML,DL,SL)
1753555
Members
5586
Online
108795
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-05-2008 09:57 PM
тАО05-05-2008 09:57 PM
Array Configuration!!
Hi,
The question i have is about Array Configuration. Which of the below two configuration would give a faster disk-to-disk write speed..
Single Array Configuration (w/Raid<>5) or
Two or more Array Configuration (w/Raid<>5).
Looking forward to your replies
sk
The question i have is about Array Configuration. Which of the below two configuration would give a faster disk-to-disk write speed..
Single Array Configuration (w/Raid<>5) or
Two or more Array Configuration (w/Raid<>5).
Looking forward to your replies
sk
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-06-2008 06:26 AM
тАО05-06-2008 06:26 AM
Re: Array Configuration!!
Single Arrag (w/Raid 5) would give you faster single-process access to the disk, since your data is being striped across more disks (more concurrent IO).
Two or more array's would give you better performance if you have multiple processes trying to do IO as both array's can be written to concurrently.
For example, in the database world it is standard practice to separate out Logs and Data on separate logical disks. This allows both to be written to concurrently, increasing IO throughput.
Regards,
Meredith Shaebanyan
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-06-2008 09:56 PM
тАО05-06-2008 09:56 PM
Re: Array Configuration!!
Thank you for the response.
As far as writing speed is concerned, i dont have any fond memories with Raid5. After years of working with Raid5 on our Database server, we finally saw great improvement when we started using Raid1+0.
Requirement:
We are using VMWare on our servers and it was found that disks configured with Raid5 took double the time (than Raid10) to copy files from the Host machine to the Guest VM. The guest VMs will function as my backup or hot spares for my production server. The daily/hourly backups would come and sit on the Host machine and will be transfered to the guest VM. The transfer (or copying) performance was better on a similar server with Raid10 than the one on Raid5. So having that confirmed, i just need to decide if to keep both the host and guest on the same array configured with Raid10 or have two arrays of Raid10 housing the host and the guest. Dont forget..there is going to be a lot of writing involved. The server is a ML 370 DualCore Dual Processor G5 with 10Gigs of Ram and 9/146gb disks.
sk
As far as writing speed is concerned, i dont have any fond memories with Raid5. After years of working with Raid5 on our Database server, we finally saw great improvement when we started using Raid1+0.
Requirement:
We are using VMWare on our servers and it was found that disks configured with Raid5 took double the time (than Raid10) to copy files from the Host machine to the Guest VM. The guest VMs will function as my backup or hot spares for my production server. The daily/hourly backups would come and sit on the Host machine and will be transfered to the guest VM. The transfer (or copying) performance was better on a similar server with Raid10 than the one on Raid5. So having that confirmed, i just need to decide if to keep both the host and guest on the same array configured with Raid10 or have two arrays of Raid10 housing the host and the guest. Dont forget..there is going to be a lot of writing involved. The server is a ML 370 DualCore Dual Processor G5 with 10Gigs of Ram and 9/146gb disks.
sk
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-08-2008 01:58 AM
тАО05-08-2008 01:58 AM
Re: Array Configuration!!
Two RAID 1 arrays are essentially the same as one big RAID 10 array.
Be aware that the actual performance difference with any RAID configuration is nowhere near the difference you will gain by purchasing an appropriate cache module for your RAID card.
Be aware that the actual performance difference with any RAID configuration is nowhere near the difference you will gain by purchasing an appropriate cache module for your RAID card.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP