- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- HPE ProLiant
- >
- ProLiant Servers (ML,DL,SL)
- >
- Re: Blade infrastructure and servers
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-04-2006 01:30 AM
тАО08-04-2006 01:30 AM
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-04-2006 02:07 AM
тАО08-04-2006 02:07 AM
Re: Blade infrastructure and servers
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-04-2006 08:33 AM
тАО08-04-2006 08:33 AM
Re: Blade infrastructure and servers
Albert
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-04-2006 09:35 AM
тАО08-04-2006 09:35 AM
SolutionAlso, although it is no longer offered, the BL40p was a Xeon 4p server that featured 4 HDs and supported either RAID 1+0 or RAID 5. The newly announced BL480c support 4 small form factor SAS drives in RAID 1+0 or RAID 5, and with an upgrade can support RAID 6 (advanced data guarding).
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-04-2006 07:37 PM
тАО08-04-2006 07:37 PM
Re: Blade infrastructure and servers
I should have been more clear with my above reply that I was referring to BL 20's and 35's as I havent had the chance yet to deal with the 40's or 480c models.
Albert
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО08-06-2006 08:01 PM
тАО08-06-2006 08:01 PM
Re: Blade infrastructure and servers
It is not necessarily, that SAN solution is more expensive. For ex. BL 20 with internal HDD would cost even more than BL35 with SAN HDD (if we compare same performance CPUs). Though, some might see some additional server features in BL20 that are not found in the BL35, not everybody really need those features. I can agree that in the SAN environment server HDDs (ether internal or external) are generally used for RAID 1+0, that is, only for server OS, but DB or APP data is stored on the external disk arrays.
In my situation server HDD (ether internal or external) will be used purely for OS. As far as I am concerned, will there be any reasonable functional difference between these two solutions (not taking in account financial issue).