- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- HPE ProLiant
- >
- ProLiant Servers (ML,DL,SL)
- >
- DL380 G5 Array Advise
ProLiant Servers (ML,DL,SL)
1753797
Members
7651
Online
108805
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-26-2008 07:16 AM
тАО02-26-2008 07:16 AM
I just received a DL380 G5 with 7 drives in the array. I was wondering what is the best way to setup the root/boot drives (Windows 2003 Enterprise Server). I am used to having dedicated root/boot drives and a seperate array for data drives, but the default is to setup the boot drives from the array (with a Logical drive from the array).
This system will also be a SQL 2005 DB Server.
Would setting up the boot volume for Windows be fault tolerant if I just took a 65GB slice of the RAID 1/0 for the OS and use the remainder for the SQL DB.
For fault tolerance, do I need to setup one of the drives to be a hot spare?
Any help/advise would be appreciated.
This system will also be a SQL 2005 DB Server.
Would setting up the boot volume for Windows be fault tolerant if I just took a 65GB slice of the RAID 1/0 for the OS and use the remainder for the SQL DB.
For fault tolerance, do I need to setup one of the drives to be a hot spare?
Any help/advise would be appreciated.
Solved! Go to Solution.
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-26-2008 08:27 AM
тАО02-26-2008 08:27 AM
Re: DL380 G5 Array Advise
Depends on if the Database server is going to be hammered intensively or just a standard database usage.
Disk writing to RAID 1 is best for performance, so a real high end SQL Database server would have a RAID1 volume for the Databases and another RAID1 for the logs. It would also be beneficial to attach the database array to a separate array controller with a large amount of write cache.
Disk space is also a factor, if you need all the space, then a simple RAID5 with all 7 drives will work pretty fine, with slightly reduced performance.
If the high-end disk write performance isn't a requirement, then RAID5 or a split of RAID1 for the OS and RAID5 for database/logs will work too.
Hope this is helpful and not too confusing.
Disk writing to RAID 1 is best for performance, so a real high end SQL Database server would have a RAID1 volume for the Databases and another RAID1 for the logs. It would also be beneficial to attach the database array to a separate array controller with a large amount of write cache.
Disk space is also a factor, if you need all the space, then a simple RAID5 with all 7 drives will work pretty fine, with slightly reduced performance.
If the high-end disk write performance isn't a requirement, then RAID5 or a split of RAID1 for the OS and RAID5 for database/logs will work too.
Hope this is helpful and not too confusing.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-26-2008 08:47 AM
тАО02-26-2008 08:47 AM
Solution
I think that RAID1 for the OS (2hdd's) and RAID5 for database/logs (5 hdd's) is the best choice.
You dont need a hot spare for fault tolerance, the RAID is fault tolerant by himself.Hot spare means that if, for example, one of your OS HDDs in RAID 1 fails, the 2nd will start rebuilding on the hot spare.If you do not have a hot spare the logical drive will be degraded but still functional and you will have to replace the failed HDD to start the rebuild.
For additional info see the ACU user guide:
http://search.hp.com/redirect.html?type=REG&qt=array+configuration+utility+user+guide&url=http%3A//docs.hp.com/en/9320/acu.pdf%3Fjumpid%3Dreg_R1002_USEN&pos=1
You dont need a hot spare for fault tolerance, the RAID is fault tolerant by himself.Hot spare means that if, for example, one of your OS HDDs in RAID 1 fails, the 2nd will start rebuilding on the hot spare.If you do not have a hot spare the logical drive will be degraded but still functional and you will have to replace the failed HDD to start the rebuild.
For additional info see the ACU user guide:
http://search.hp.com/redirect.html?type=REG&qt=array+configuration+utility+user+guide&url=http%3A//docs.hp.com/en/9320/acu.pdf%3Fjumpid%3Dreg_R1002_USEN&pos=1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-26-2008 08:54 AM
тАО02-26-2008 08:54 AM
Re: DL380 G5 Array Advise
Hello,
I won't use RAID 5 for databases, because databases do often "short writes". A logical write IO on a RAID 5 will result in two read (block to change and parity), the recalculation of the new parity block, and two write IOs (write new block and new parity block). Every parity-based RAID suffers under this "write penalty". Better use four disks in a RAID 1+0 and one global hot spare for your databases. Also you should use a battery backed write cache module for you Smart Array controller. Otherwise the controller will disable the write cache.
Hope this helps.
Best regards,
Patrick
I won't use RAID 5 for databases, because databases do often "short writes". A logical write IO on a RAID 5 will result in two read (block to change and parity), the recalculation of the new parity block, and two write IOs (write new block and new parity block). Every parity-based RAID suffers under this "write penalty". Better use four disks in a RAID 1+0 and one global hot spare for your databases. Also you should use a battery backed write cache module for you Smart Array controller. Otherwise the controller will disable the write cache.
Hope this helps.
Best regards,
Patrick
Best regards,
Patrick
Patrick
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP