- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- HPE ProLiant
- >
- ProLiant Servers (ML,DL,SL)
- >
- Re: DL385 G2 and SLES 10.1 - Performance
ProLiant Servers (ML,DL,SL)
1753846
Members
7797
Online
108807
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-03-2008 08:10 AM
07-03-2008 08:10 AM
DL385 G2 and SLES 10.1 - Performance
Hi,
We've installed SLES10.1 (and .2) on a DL385 G2 server (Dual Core Opteron 2.40 GHz). We're running Java and DB2 on it. We're having some fairly severe performance issues that we can't seem to diagnose. The exact same tests on an IBM x3650 server (Dual Core Xeon 3.0 GHz) yield 300% better performance.
We're measuring performance by tracking the CPU time that it takes to perform a use case. For example, Use Case 1 takes 30 CPU seconds on the IBM machine, and 95 on the HP.
My question - is there something in the install of Linux that does not optimize a setting? I'm downloading the latest firmware - I'll apply that. But this seems QUITE odd.
Thanks,
Rick
We've installed SLES10.1 (and .2) on a DL385 G2 server (Dual Core Opteron 2.40 GHz). We're running Java and DB2 on it. We're having some fairly severe performance issues that we can't seem to diagnose. The exact same tests on an IBM x3650 server (Dual Core Xeon 3.0 GHz) yield 300% better performance.
We're measuring performance by tracking the CPU time that it takes to perform a use case. For example, Use Case 1 takes 30 CPU seconds on the IBM machine, and 95 on the HP.
My question - is there something in the install of Linux that does not optimize a setting? I'm downloading the latest firmware - I'll apply that. But this seems QUITE odd.
Thanks,
Rick
1 REPLY 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-07-2008 09:00 AM
07-07-2008 09:00 AM
Re: DL385 G2 and SLES 10.1 - Performance
Are you binding threads/processes to processors? The DL385 G2, being based on Opteron processors is a "NUMA" (Non-Uniform Memory Access) system whereas your x3650, being based on Xeon is a "UMA" (Uniform Memory Access) system.
On your SLES10 installs there should be a command called "numactl" which can be used to show some of the numa characteristics of the system.
Other pseudo random things - memory is installed "evenly" across the two sockets in the DL385 yes?
Have you tweaked anything in the BIOS like "node interleave?" (IIRC it defaults to disabled.
On your SLES10 installs there should be a command called "numactl" which can be used to show some of the numa characteristics of the system.
Other pseudo random things - memory is installed "evenly" across the two sockets in the DL385 yes?
Have you tweaked anything in the BIOS like "node interleave?" (IIRC it defaults to disabled.
there is no rest for the wicked yet the virtuous have no pillows
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP