- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- HPE ProLiant
- >
- ProLiant Servers (ML,DL,SL)
- >
- HP Proliant DL360 gen9 with Smart Array P440ar Con...
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-19-2018 07:40 AM
тАО01-19-2018 07:40 AM
HP Proliant DL360 gen9 with Smart Array P440ar Controller and 4x SSD in RAID 10 slow performance
We have bought 3 almost identical Servers.
All are HP Proliant DL360 gen9 with Smart Array P440ar Raid Controller, Xeon E5-2620v4, 32GB RAM
Only diffrence is one has 4x HP SSD disks in Raid 10
The second has 8x HP 7200K SATA Disks in Raid 10
The third one has 8x HP 10kSAS in raid 10
Two have ESXi 5.5.5 update 3 installed with two Windows 2012R2 VM's on them
The one with the SAS disks has Server 2016 Hyper-V with two Windows 2016 VM's on it
When we do diffrent Disk Benchmarks (AS SSD, Atto Benchmark, Crystal Disk mark) we notice that the one with the SSD's perform at only 55% of the speed compared to the ones with the SATA and SAS disks.
Crystal Disk Mark results:
Raid 10 SAS Disks = 6866 MB/s read and 6027 MB/s Write
Raid 10 SATA Disks = 4316 MB/s read and 4521 MB/s Write
Raid 10 SSD Disks = 2106 MB/s read and 2233 MB/s write
I've read a lot on google about SSD's not performing well in a Raid, Drive Cache needs to be on or off. But I cant seem to find the problem here.
Any advice would be helpfull
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-19-2018 07:53 AM
тАО01-19-2018 07:53 AM
Re: HP Proliant DL360 gen9 with Smart Array P440ar Controller and 4x SSD in RAID 10 slow performance
Check the status of your SSD Smart Path settings on the array in the controller settings. Toggle and retest.
I work for HPE. The comments in this post are my own and do not represent an official reply from the company. No warranty or guarantees of any kind are expressed in my reply.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-22-2018 04:10 AM
тАО01-22-2018 04:10 AM
Re: HP Proliant DL360 gen9 with Smart Array P440ar Controller and 4x SSD in RAID 10 slow performance
Hi Mike,
thanks for the quick responce.
I verified with my colleagues and Smart path is already turned off / disabled.
Any other suggestions are welcome.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-10-2018 03:52 PM
тАО07-10-2018 03:52 PM
Re: HP Proliant DL360 gen9 with Smart Array P440ar Controller and 4x SSD in RAID 10 slow performance
Any update on what might cause this aside from "SmartPath" and caching on disk versus using the controller cache.
Thanks, GC