- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- HPE ProLiant
- >
- ProLiant Servers (ML,DL,SL)
- >
- Hotswap on predictive failure = ok?
ProLiant Servers (ML,DL,SL)
1752421
Members
5983
Online
108788
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-06-2006 07:16 AM
тАО12-06-2006 07:16 AM
Hotswap on predictive failure = ok?
We have had some debate around the office if replacing a hard drive that has predictive failure while still online is safe. A co-worker has told me that an HP tech support specialists instructed him not to. HP said that the drive was still currently being written to, and that it could result in data loss. Most of servers are setup at RAID 1+0. I can see the point, but if the drives are mirrored, wouldn't the same data write to the other drive and not matter if one of the drives was replaced.
Thanks in advance.
Thanks in advance.
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-08-2006 12:50 AM
тАО12-08-2006 12:50 AM
Re: Hotswap on predictive failure = ok?
Yes, it's ok. You need to make sure there are no other failed drives in the array.
You want to replace any failed drives 1st. Then replace prefailed drives.
You never want to cause or force a situation where 2 drives in the array are failed at once.
Make sure the array has completed any rebuilding of other failed drives also. Then, go ahead and replace.
You want to replace any failed drives 1st. Then replace prefailed drives.
You never want to cause or force a situation where 2 drives in the array are failed at once.
Make sure the array has completed any rebuilding of other failed drives also. Then, go ahead and replace.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО12-08-2006 03:41 AM
тАО12-08-2006 03:41 AM
Re: Hotswap on predictive failure = ok?
Pull drive out online with Predictive failure and Consequences
It's ok if you positively that no other problems in the array
It's ok if you do it quickly enough, add replacement only if recovery mode enabled
It's ok if server is not under intense write operation
It's safer for servers that use BBWC
It's ok if you have most resent SCSI firmware and drivers
It's ok if you have good valid backup
As seen on the practice, but not finally, so it's only thoughts.
Problems that might happen, if:
- Server under performance degradation and intense write operation; once you pull drive out you trigger services to swap to another process, small data portion can be misplaced and lead to corruption.
- Nature of failure has ability to pass on the second HDD and cause corruption.
- Replacement done so quick, and agents had not detected recovery mode and replacement hard drive detected as new, along one that you pulled reported as failed later.
- Drive that you used is not clean and cause RIS corruptions or rebuild problem with followed corruption.
- Other
If you have any doubt that it won't work for you, bring system down, pull drive out, power up server, accept Recovery mode and plug replacement drive after.
All seen incidents extremely rare, unique and equal to one small fish in the big ocean.
See attachment for LED status and meaning if that helps.
It's ok if you positively that no other problems in the array
It's ok if you do it quickly enough, add replacement only if recovery mode enabled
It's ok if server is not under intense write operation
It's safer for servers that use BBWC
It's ok if you have most resent SCSI firmware and drivers
It's ok if you have good valid backup
As seen on the practice, but not finally, so it's only thoughts.
Problems that might happen, if:
- Server under performance degradation and intense write operation; once you pull drive out you trigger services to swap to another process, small data portion can be misplaced and lead to corruption.
- Nature of failure has ability to pass on the second HDD and cause corruption.
- Replacement done so quick, and agents had not detected recovery mode and replacement hard drive detected as new, along one that you pulled reported as failed later.
- Drive that you used is not clean and cause RIS corruptions or rebuild problem with followed corruption.
- Other
If you have any doubt that it won't work for you, bring system down, pull drive out, power up server, accept Recovery mode and plug replacement drive after.
All seen incidents extremely rare, unique and equal to one small fish in the big ocean.
See attachment for LED status and meaning if that helps.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP