- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- HPE ProLiant
- >
- ProLiant Servers (ML,DL,SL)
- >
- Obtaining a single-port 72GB 10k SAS (2.5) - for D...
ProLiant Servers (ML,DL,SL)
1753922
Members
7260
Online
108810
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-18-2010 08:11 AM
тАО02-18-2010 08:11 AM
Obtaining a single-port 72GB 10k SAS (2.5) - for DL360 (G5)
One of our mirrored drives has failed and I'm tryinf to get HP to replace (under CarePack etc.) the drive. However, every drive they are sending (with and without an engineer) is labelled the same as the one thats failed - but (get this) .. its a dual-port SAS.
Generally with a lower capacity, consequently the mirror will not pick up :-( .
Does anyone else have this problem ?
[or am I special!]
Generally with a lower capacity, consequently the mirror will not pick up :-( .
Does anyone else have this problem ?
[or am I special!]
2 REPLIES 2
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-18-2010 10:14 AM
тАО02-18-2010 10:14 AM
Re: Obtaining a single-port 72GB 10k SAS (2.5) - for DL360 (G5)
The dual port drives will work in a single port drive bay but if the drive geometry is shorter, that's a problem. The mirror will not rebuild because the source drive has more drive sectors that the destination. Raise that as an issue with HP and escalate the problem if you have to.
Other than that, you can look into utilizing the new drives that they have send you by setting up a new mirror pair (if you have empty slots) and set up new LUNs/partitions to migrate your data over.
Other than that, you can look into utilizing the new drives that they have send you by setting up a new mirror pair (if you have empty slots) and set up new LUNs/partitions to migrate your data over.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-19-2010 12:47 AM
тАО02-19-2010 12:47 AM
Re: Obtaining a single-port 72GB 10k SAS (2.5) - for DL360 (G5)
Thanks TTr,
This pair was the boot disk for the server, so establishing a new mirror would require re-installing the OS (yes?) rather than just pushing the files off the 1/2 mirror that's running.
I think I'll try to escalate this within HP, it seems a rather drastic measure to take, for a small component, and one that will impact the downtime. We may be a small company in their grand scheme, but this sort of [engineering] behaviour does not put HP in a good light.
This pair was the boot disk for the server, so establishing a new mirror would require re-installing the OS (yes?) rather than just pushing the files off the 1/2 mirror that's running.
I think I'll try to escalate this within HP, it seems a rather drastic measure to take, for a small component, and one that will impact the downtime. We may be a small company in their grand scheme, but this sort of [engineering] behaviour does not put HP in a good light.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP